Three years of lies (sorry, visionary leadership!) just to show you ads. This is what this guy is. Do you trust him with your personal data and your information hygiene?


LinkedIn Content Strategy & Writing Style
PhD in AI, author of ๐ The Hundred-Page Language Models Book and ๐ The Hundred-Page Machine Learning Book
2 people tracking this creator on Viral Brain
Andriy Burkov positions himself as a high-authority bridge between academic rigor and practical engineering, leveraging his status as a seminal AI author to curate the path to technical mastery. His content strategy centers on distilling complex machine learning research into structured, high-signal curricula, moving beyond surface-level hype to focus on first principles like diffusion models and GAN stability. He is notable for his refusal to simplify the science, instead providing the tools-specifically through his ChapterPal AI tutor integrations-to help practitioners navigate the "messy uncertainty" of the field. This creates a unique intersection of expert-led education and product-driven utility, where his deep skepticism of modern design trends and "hand-waving" in AI development reinforces his brand as a no-nonsense guardian of technical excellence.
482.2K
27.8K
247
โ
8.9
6
2
Three years of lies (sorry, visionary leadership!) just to show you ads. This is what this guy is. Do you trust him with your personal data and your information hygiene?

Some still don't understand (I know, it's hard and will take time) that manually fixing AI-generated code isn't going to happen. The non-fixable code will simply be regenerated from scratch based onโฆ

Two agentic-coding chatbots: Claude and ChatGPT. Both can take a zip file with an app, fix it, and return the fixed zip back. Claude: fast and effective. ChatGPT: slow and less effective. Why? Obsโฆ
Coding was solved because coding is a deterministic task (code either works or doesn't work) and because of how simple it is to define the reward for reinforcement learning: 1 when code produces the eโฆ
This week's edition of my AI newsletter has just been dispatched to subscribers. Featured in this issue: making sense of memory in AI agents; a tutorial on building an AI agent; a new suite of open trโฆ
I'm sure your employer's corporate website looks like these screenshots. The same background, the same fat sans serif fonts, same hero sections, the same "trusted by" logo bars, the same pricing tableโฆ

8.9 posts/week
Posts / Week
0.9 days
Days Between Posts
2
Total Posts Analyzed
HIGH
Posting Frequency
0%
Avg Engagement Rate
STABLE
Performance Trend
90
Avg Length (Words)
HIGH
Depth Level
ADVANCED
Expertise Level
8.5/10
Uniqueness Score
YES
Question Usage
0.4%
Response Rate
Writing style breakdown
A sharp, opinionated, slightly sardonic commentary mode (posts 1โ4, 7 partially).
A precise, technically rigorous explainer mode aimed at an educated but non-specialist audience (posts 5โ10, and 6, 7 strongly).
Professional yet conversational.
Direct and often blunt; occasionally cutting or sarcastic.
Highly informative and analytic, with clear didactic intent when explaining papers or concepts.
It is not flowery or poetic. It is economical, concrete, and grounded in real-world examples and technical specifics.
In opinion posts: high-energy, incisive, and somewhat confrontational.
In technical summaries: calm but brisk, efficient, and confident.
Disillusionment with current industry practices (design, corporate behavior, product/UX).
Respect for craftsmanship, originality, and true technical understanding.
Mildly provocative or critical opening.
Reasoned explanation or context.
Concluding jab, reflection, or implication that things could (and should) be better.
Example patterns: '(I know, itโs hard and will take time)', '(sorry, visionary leadership!)'.
Old vs new, human vs machine, past craft vs current templating, simple deterministic tasks vs messy uncertainty.
Referring to obvious manipulations as 'visionary leadership' in parentheses.
'~90% of what we need our brain forโฆ'
'Ever wondered why?'
'Why?'
'Do you trust him with your personal data and your information hygiene?'
Dry, slightly bitter, often tucked into parentheses or rephrasings.
Not slapstick; more like quiet intellectual disdain.
'Coding was solved because coding is a deterministic taskโฆ'
'Three years of lies (sorry, visionary leadership!) just to show you ads.'
For personal experience, perspective, or conjecture ('When I started to build websitesโฆ', 'I thought it was due to fashion and trends.').
To involve or challenge the reader ('Ever wondered why?', 'Do you trust himโฆ?').
To discuss systems, papers, companies, and 'Product Designers' as a class.
Often assumes an intelligent, technically literate reader.
'Read with an AI tutor: โฆ'
'Read alone: โฆ'
Newsletter announcement implies: subscribe and read, without explicitly ordering.
Overall: voice is that of a technically deep, slightly jaded expert who alternates between critiquing industry trends and patiently summarizing research/papers for a serious audience.
Sign in to unlock the full writing analysis
Nail your LinkedIn strategy with ViralBrain.
Analyze and write in Andriy Burkov's style. Grow your LinkedIn to the next level.