Kim Loohuis's LinkedIn Strategy, Tech &…

My first feature for The Register is out today 🎉 looking at how Europe is tackling its 90% dependency on US cloud infrastructure. While Brussels debates policy and American hyperscalers market 'sove…

1652028100 viral

Cloud Sovereignty & Data Privacy9 months ago

View on LinkedIn

Europa betaalt jaarlijks 265 miljard euro aan Amerikaanse techbedrijven voor cloud en software. Dat is evenveel als het bbp van Portugal. En dat geld versterkt niet het Europese digitale ecosysteem,…

1501013100 viral

Digital Sovereignty6 months ago

View on LinkedIn

Europa wil digitaal onafhankelijk zijn, maar blijft steken in fragmentatie. Terwijl Amerikaanse techreuzen als AWS en Microsoft een geïntegreerd platform bieden, heeft Europa een losse verzameling lev…

100477100 viral

Cloud Computing8 months ago

View on LinkedIn

𝗔𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗻𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘂𝘀 𝗘𝘂𝗿𝗼𝗽𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗲𝘁: 𝘄𝗶𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘂𝗱𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝘄𝗲𝗲 𝘃𝘂𝗿𝗲𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗮𝘁? De CLOUD Act en de GDPR sta…

5227383 viral

Data Privacy & Compliance8 months ago

View on LinkedIn

DNS Belgium neemt afscheid van AWS. Niet omdat ze ontevreden zijn over de dienstverlening, maar vanuit de wens digitaal soevereiner te worden. "We kunnen niet prediken dat organisaties voor lokale d…

949367 viral

Cloud Computing7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

𝗗𝗲 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝘁 𝗱𝗶𝗴𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝘃𝗮𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗮𝗮𝗸𝘁 De Tweede Kamer maakt zich zorgen over de overname van DigiD-leverancier Solvinity door het Amerika…

3910657 viral

Digital Sovereignty8 months ago

View on LinkedIn

Topics & Content Focus

Primary Topics

European digital sovereignty through cloud, open-source procurement, and geopolitical risk managementHuman-centered AI/BI transformation: decision-first design, leadership narrative, and adoption psychologyCritical internet infrastructure security: systemic architectural change vs incremental patching

Secondary Themes

Public-sector and enterprise IT strategy (buy vs build, platform migration, portfolio choices)Tech economics and hidden costs (TCO, payback periods, externalities of vendor dependency)Organizational change as the true constraint in technology programs

Industry Focus

European enterprise IT leadership (C-suite, boards, CIO/CTO orgs)Public sector and regulated industries (government, finance, justice) with sovereignty constraintsCybersecurity and network infrastructure stakeholders

Content Categories

Journalistic feature distribution (link-led reporting with quotes)Executive synthesis and translation (turning tech into boardroom language)Case-study economics (ROI/payback framing for strategy choices)Policy-to-practice commentary (geopolitics mapped to procurement decisions)

Performance Insights

50.75%

Avg Engagement Rate

STABLE

Performance Trend

Best Performing Topics

Digital sovereignty framed as geopolitical leverage ("kill switch" / vendor control)Procurement-as-policy economics (hidden costs, industrial-policy framing)Hard infrastructure security narratives with proof via real deployments (SCION, finance network)

Virality Signals

High share propensity when posts combine (a) systemic risk + (b) a clean narrative villain (dependency) + (c) a concrete incidentMemorable numbers and comparisons that travel well outside the immediate nicheQuotable, polarizing lines (control, leverage, "not a neutral IT choice") that invite debate and reposts

Structure & Quality

1600

Avg Length (Words)

HIGH

Depth Level

ADVANCED

Expertise Level

0.78/10

Uniqueness Score

Common Hooks

Counterintuitive failure framing ("it fails not because of tech, but because...")Big-number economic anchor (spend comparisons, large annual outflows, payback periods)Systemic-risk opener (infrastructure that "was never designed to be secure")Geopolitical or institutional incident as proof-point (real-world enforcement/lockout example)Authority-by-proxy (lead with named experts + direct quotes to establish credibility fast)

Common Endings

Single clear CTA to read the full piece, followed by a direct linkHashtag block that signals domain (AI/BI leadership, sovereignty, infra/security)

Value Delivery Methods

Turns complex technology into board-level decision frames (risk, control, ROI, accountability)Uses credible third-party voices to compress trust-buildingProvides decision heuristics (decision-first data approach; replace-foundation vs patch logic)Connects technical choices to political economy and institutional consequences

Formatting Style

Short paragraphs with high readabilityFrequent use of quoted speech and named attributionStrategic numeracy (1–3 memorable figures per post)Contrast pairs (tech vs people, patch vs replace, cost vs payoff)Occasional analogy to translate complexity (e.g., infrastructure foundation metaphor)

Audience & Tone

YES

Question Usage

Response Rate

Detected Tone

Analytical journalist with a strategic-policy lensSystems thinker (root-cause over symptoms)Skeptical of vendor narratives; pro-institutional resilienceBoardroom translator (tech-to-decision language)semi-formalmixed

Interaction Style

Debate-driven engagement around sovereignty, vendor power, and policy implicationsSignal-boosting behavior (shares) when posts provide strong framing language for others to reuseMore comments when the post implies moral/strategic stakes vs purely operational lessons

Community Building Signals

Builds an identity-based readership around European autonomy and systems-level tech realismReinforces a recurring worldview: people/process and incentives dominate tools; infrastructure change is psychological/politicalRelies more on publishing cadence + consistent framing than on back-and-forth conversation

Writing Style Patterns

Content Strategy

Hook: Counterintuitive failure framing ("it fails not because of tTone: semi-formalCTA: Soft directive ("Lees het stuk" / "Read the featur

Writing style breakdown

De belofte van 'low-code' was simpel: iedereen kan een developer zijn. Maar de realiteit in de boardroom is weerbarstiger.

Terwijl IT-afdelingen worstelen met legacy-systemen, bouwen business-units hun eigen schaduw-IT op platforms die ze niet volledig begrijpen. "We zien een wildgroei aan applicaties die weliswaar snel zijn gebouwd, maar die op het gebied van security en schaalbaarheid door de mand vallen," zegt een CISO van een groot Nederlands retailbedrijf.

Het probleem is niet de techniek, maar het gebrek aan governance. Zonder een duidelijke strategie wordt low-code geen versneller, maar een nieuwe vorm van technische schuld.

De vraag is: wie is er verantwoordelijk als een 'burger-app' de AVG-regels overtreedt?

Lees mijn volledige analyse over de schaduwkanten van low-code op ICT Magazine 👇

https://lnkd.in/example

#lowcode #itgovernance #digitaletransformatie #security

Kim Loohuis

Warm Analysis

Performance Overview

Top Posts by Engagement

Posting Patterns & Frequency

Best Performing Days

Best Performing Times To Post