Charlie Hills 🦩

Professional, instructional, and highly structured.

Conversational but not chatty; no fluff, no rambling.

Strongly informative and tactical with a light persuasive edge.

Optimised for LinkedIn: scannable, practical, “saveable”.

Medium-to-high energy, driven by clarity rather than hype.

Confident and authoritative, grounded in data or experience.

Calmly persuasive: “here’s what works, here’s the proof, here’s what to do”.

Emotion is controlled and purposeful (gratitude, motivation, urgency), not dramatic.

Frequent direct teaching: frameworks, checklists, phased systems, prompts.

Recurrent pattern of: bold claim or insight → structured breakdown → practical steps → CTA.

Uses micro-headings like “What actually works:”, “The fix:”, “What we will cover:”.

Leans on contrast: “OLD vs NEW”, “Most people… / Instead…”, “The real killers / The real winners”.

Uses data or authority signals (follower counts, post counts, named sources) to justify claims.

A lot of explicit meta-commentary on content itself: hooks, line length, dwell time, algorithms.

Mix of first person (“I teach…”, “I wrote…”, “It took me 1 year…”) and second person (“you”, “your”).

Second person is used to give instructions and drive action: “Make sure to…”, “Stop treating AI like…”.

Save this.

Repost to help someone in your network.

Stop following 2023 advice in 2026.

If growth feels harder than it should.

If AI feels noisy or generic.

This session is for you.

Speak as a knowledgeable operator talking to ambitious peers.

Use “I” when providing proof or experience; use “you” when giving instructions and consequences.

Sound certain, but practical and non-hypey; your authority comes from doing the work, not big adjectives.

Every paragraph should feel like it’s actively delivering value, not just “warming up”.