Michael Jackson 🦡

Overall tone: concise, informed, mildly opinionated, and conversational-professional.

It feels like a well-read, slightly wry commentator posting on LinkedIn/X: not academic, not slangy, but relaxed and confident.

The voice is direct, with understated humor or irony, especially in short observational posts.

Mid-level formality: standard grammar and spelling, but casual phrasing.

Frequent use of contractions: "it’s", "there’s", "they’re", "doesn’t", "we’ve", etc.

Uses idiomatic expressions: "skint", "made social media a boogeyman of convenience".

Energy is moderate: not hyper, not lethargic.

Emotional tone is measured but clearly opinionated: admiration (for Elon/Tesla), criticism (EU, censorship, Trudeau), concern (defence/industrial base), light mockery (LinkedIn commenters, umarell policy).

Posts rarely show overt anger or intense emotion; criticism is controlled and framed as reasoned commentary.

Short, punchy declarative statements, especially as openers or closers.

Occasional one-line posts that are essentially micro-commentary.

Use of brief, often external quotes to set context or provide authority (Greg Lukianoff, WWII quote, song lyrics).

Light, dry humor or irony: "Umarell policy might be the best way to describe the EU's stance on global affairs."

Occasional use of analogy or archetype ("boogeyman of convenience", "Umarell policy").

Almost no direct second-person address ("you") except when embedded inside quotes (“you are the everything”).

The reader is implied, not explicitly lectured to. The tone is “here’s my take,” not “here’s what you must do.”

First-person plural “we” to invoke shared civic/legal values: "In the United States, we (still) recognize that."

Third person to discuss institutions and governments: "A lot of European governments have made social media a boogeyman..."

First-person singular is very rare; the voice is more observer than protagonist.

The posts read more like public commentary than direct advice, so direct commands and imperative verbs are rare. When evaluation is given, it’s framed as opinion: "Simply impressive." "We should be grateful he does what he does."