Adam Janes

Conversational but thoughtful and analytical.

Professional yet accessible; feels like a smart colleague or mentor talking, not a marketer.

Informative and reflective with a light persuasive undercurrent.

Direct and clear; no fluff, no over-the-top hype.

Mildly contrarian: often challenges common beliefs, marketing promises, or popular narratives.

Middle ground between casual and professional.

Uses contractions (“don’t”, “isn’t”, “won’t”) and plain language.

Avoids heavy jargon unless necessary, then explains it in simple terms.

No slangy talk like “gonna”, “wanna”, etc. Language stays clean and neutral.

Calm, measured, and controlled.

Energy comes from contrast and clarity, not from exclamation points or dramatic wording.

Slightly skeptical toward hype.

Curious about implications.

Concerned about tradeoffs (privacy vs convenience, cost vs reliability, etc.).

Humor is very light and rare, usually subtle (e.g., “like it was 2010”) or a single emoji.

Frequent use of rhetorical questions to pivot, provoke thought, or close.

Convenience vs privacy.

Cheap vs actually expensive.

Typist vs director.

Tailored vs cookie-cutter.

Convenience is the bait. Our data is the hook.

The $10,000 hammer-tap story.

AI as a backend engineer.

Clear, concise lists to break down points (often using “=>”).

Repetition of key words or phrases in slightly different ways to reinforce concepts.

Direct address to the reader with “you” and “we” to create intimacy and shared experience.

Mix of first-person singular (“I trusted…”, “I finally…”, “I’ve personally fed…”) and first-person plural (“we share”, “we choose”, “we are moving”).

If you want results…

If you want to thrive…

Are you a good generalist…?

Direct: “Stop obsessing over the lowest price tag.”

Softened with rationale: “If you want to thrive, master the theory…”

Is there a better AI assistant that actually works?

Would you trust a tool like this for your critical tasks?