Nikki Siapno's LinkedIn Strategy, Eng Manager…

Things Every Engineer Should Know: SQL Execution Order. Most engineers read SQL top-down, but that only explains intent. Performance requires a second pass that follows execution order. A SQL query…

LinkedIn post image: Things Every Engineer Should Know: SQL Execution Order.

1.5K6027719 viral

SQL Query Optimization7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

I wrote 25 articles for 25 system design concepts: 1. JWT: https://lnkd.in/gdF2ce3K 2. Idempotency: https://lnkd.in/gj5YZCKs 3. Rate limiting: https://lnkd.in/gFe2knKy 4. Observability: https://ln…

LinkedIn post image: I wrote 25 articles for 25 system design concepts:

1.0K4620613 viral

System Design7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

Stateful vs Stateless Design. Stateless design is a powerful model that has led to the development of simple yet highly scalable and efficient applications. “State” refers to stored information that…

LinkedIn post image: Stateful vs Stateless Design.

730531068 viral

Software Architecture7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

6 Software Architecture Patterns Engineers Should Know: Choosing the right architecture isn’t about following trends. It’s about aligning with your application’s needs, your team’s expertise, and the…

LinkedIn post image: 6 Software Architecture Patterns Engineers Should Know:

60445987 viral

Software Architecture6 months ago

View on LinkedIn

If you want to grow as a software engineer, try these newsletters (all free): 1. System Design ➟ https://lnkd.in/gDCD8gaq 2. Engineering Leadership ➟ https://lnkd.in/g3wQkZX9 3. Insider Knowledge B…

LinkedIn post image: If you want to grow as a software engineer,

40740745 viral

Software Engineering Learning Resources7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

API Gateway Clearly Explained. An API gateway acts as a single entry point for clients, handling request routing, response composition, and protocol translation. It simplifies client interactions wit…

LinkedIn post image: API Gateway Clearly Explained.

36739725 viral

API Architecture7 months ago

View on LinkedIn

Topics & Content Focus

Primary Topics

Pragmatic System Design Education (tradeoffs, patterns, scalability choices)AI Agent Architecture for Software Delivery (SDLC surfaces, specialized agents, subagents)Engineering Team Throughput & Context Management (interruption tax, flow protection, knowledge capture)

Secondary Themes

Architecture decision-making frameworks (constraints, ownership, long-term cost)Developer productivity tooling embedded in existing workflows (Slack/Jira/Confluence)Productized learning assets (playbooks/handbooks) as lead magnets

Industry Focus

B2B developer tools and platform engineering (DevEx, SDLC, agentic tooling)SaaS for engineering productivity and knowledge managementSystem design education for working engineers and engineering leaders

Content Categories

Evergreen technical explainersMental models & taxonomy postsTradeoff-driven architecture guidanceEngineering management/operator playbooksSponsored product narratives anchored in real pain points

Performance Insights

484.5%

Avg Engagement Rate

STABLE

Performance Trend

Best Performing Topics

System design fundamentals with clear tradeoffs (stateful vs stateless)Architecture pattern roundup content (modular monolith, microservices, EDA, serverless, DDD)Evergreen educational assets tied to a free resource (handbook/playbook)

Virality Signals

Bookmarkable evergreen formats (definitions, patterns, pros/cons)Share-optimized structure (lists + clean mental models)Explicit save/repost prompts that match the content utilityAudience participation prompt that invites additions (drives comments)Resource-based conversion hooks (free playbooks/handbooks)

Structure & Quality

320

Avg Length (Words)

HIGH

Depth Level

ADVANCED

Expertise Level

0.77/10

Uniqueness Score

Common Hooks

Taxonomy/contrast hook (A vs B vs C) that promises a clearer mental modelCurated list hook (X patterns you should know) positioned as career-leverage knowledgeAuthority + diagnostic hook (after years leading teams, one signal predicts the problem)Definition-first explainer hook that quickly sets terms before tradeoffs

Common Endings

Open-loop question to solicit peer additions ("What else would you add?")Save/repost/follow ritual to encourage repeat reachResource link (playbook/handbook) or product link (sponsor integration)Brief attribution/thanks to collaborator

Value Delivery Methods

Compresses complex engineering choices into decision-ready frameworksMakes tradeoffs explicit (benefits + risks) rather than giving one-size-fits-all adviceTranslates tool/product positioning into concrete workflow pain pointsProduces reusable reference content (patterns, definitions, mental models)

Formatting Style

Skimmable micro-paragraphs with heavy line breaksBullets and numbered lists as the primary information containerArrow/chevron hierarchy to show decomposition and delegationExplicit tradeoff statements (benefit + risk) to signal engineering rigorOccasional stylized emphasis (bolded headings) to guide scanning

Audience & Tone

YES

Question Usage

0.2%

Response Rate

Detected Tone

Pragmatic architect-educatorTradeoff-first systems thinkerSmart-casual but technically rigorousOperator mindset (focus, flow, throughput) with product-aware framingsemi-formalfirst-person

Interaction Style

Peer-level prompts inviting engineers to add missing patterns/examplesDiagnostic questions that encourage self-identification with a pain pointCommunity learning cues (save/repost) that treat readers as amplifiers

Community Building Signals

Consistent end-of-post discussion promptRepeated rituals that condition audience behavior (save/repost/follow)Newsletter/playbook ecosystem that turns posts into an ongoing curriculum

Writing Style Patterns

Content Strategy

Hook: Taxonomy/contrast hook (A vs B vs C) that promises a clearerTone: semi-formalCTA: Evergreen utility CTA ("Save for later")

Writing style breakdown

Monolith vs Microservices vs Serverless.

Most developers view these as a linear progression of "better" tech, but they are actually just different ways to manage complexity and state.

Here’s the clean mental model

Monolith = Simplicity of deployment

↳ Single codebase. Unified database. Easy to test.

↳ Optimized for small teams and rapid initial velocity.

↳ Risk: Becomes a "big ball of mud" as the team scales.

Microservices = Scalability of teams

↳ Decoupled logic. Independent deployments. Polyglot stacks.

↳ Great for large organizations with complex domains.

↳ Risk: Operational complexity and network latency.

Serverless = Efficiency of resources

↳ No infrastructure management. Pay-per-use. Auto-scaling.

↳ Ideal for event-driven tasks and unpredictable workloads.

↳ Risk: Vendor lock-in and cold start issues.

So the real question isn’t “which is the most modern?”

It’s which tradeoff your team is equipped to handle.

For most startups, the winning architecture looks like this

A modular monolith to start

Extracting microservices only when the pain of the monolith exceeds the pain of the network

One repo.

Clear boundaries.

Strategic extraction.

The shift isn’t “moving to the cloud.”

It’s moving toward the right boundaries.

What else would you add?

🔖 Save for later.

♻️ Repost to help others learn system design.

➕ Follow Nikki Siapno + turn on notifications.

Nikki Siapno

Warm Analysis

Performance Overview

Top Posts by Engagement

Posting Patterns & Frequency

Best Performing Days

Best Performing Times To Post