Khulan Dav ✦'s Practical AI Creativity Playbook

Khulan Dav ✦ Feels Like the Future of Creative Work

I clicked into Khulan Dav ✦'s profile expecting "cool AI art" and a lot of hype. Instead I found something more interesting: a creator with 18,879 followers posting about practical AI creative workflows, yet pulling a 195.00 Hero Score. That score is basically a signal that the audience isn't just there - they're reacting.

So I started comparing. I lined Khulan up next to Giovanni Beggiato (42,691 followers, 194 Hero Score) and Diane Massé (13,029 followers, 193 Hero Score). Three very different niches. Similar elite engagement relative to size. And a bunch of patterns I honestly wasn't expecting.

Here's what stood out:

• Khulan wins by teaching like a peer - specific workflows, prompt structures, and takeaways instead of vibes.
• Giovanni wins by selling a clear outcome - money + a repeatable path - and making the CTA feel like the next step.
• Diane wins by being consistently useful in a human domain - hiring, people, clarity - where trust matters more than novelty.

---

Khulan Dav ✦'s Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: Khulan isn't the biggest account in this comparison, but the Hero Score is the highest. That usually means the content is doing more than getting polite likes - it's sparking saves, shares, long comments, and repeat readers. Also, 4.0 posts per week is a real cadence. Not spammy, not "once in a while" either. It's the kind of rhythm that trains an audience to expect you.

Key Performance Indicators

---

What Makes Khulan Dav ✦'s Content Work

Khulan's thing (from what I can tell) is simple but hard to copy: make advanced creative work feel doable. Not watered down. Just structured. And that's a big deal on LinkedIn, where "AI" posts often swing between jargon soup and shallow inspiration.

1. Workflow-first teaching (not opinion-first posting)

So here's what they do: instead of writing "AI is changing creativity," Khulan tends to anchor posts in an experiment or build. The content is usually shaped like: a surprising result, the steps that got there, then a "Takeaway" that tells you why it matters. You can almost feel the creator thinking, "If you copy this, you should get something useful today."

Key Insight: If you can explain your process in steps, your audience will trust your results.

This works because it reduces the reader's risk. You're not asking them to buy an idea - you're handing them a path. And in creative work, a path is gold because the hardest part is often "Where do I even start?"

Strategy Breakdown:

2. Consistent formatting that makes scrolling easy

Now, here's where it gets interesting: the writing isn't just "good" - it's engineered for the feed. Short paragraphs. Labels like "Key highlights:" and "Takeaway:". White space that makes your eyes rest. If you read it quickly, you still get value. If you read it slowly, you get depth.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

And if you're wondering whether that really matters - it does. LinkedIn is a scrolling environment. Structure is a feature, not decoration.

3. Authority without acting like a guru

Khulan's headline matters here: AI Creative @ Google | AI Art Direction & Creative Workflows. That can easily turn into "Listen to me, I'm important." But the tone (based on the style patterns) reads more like: "I'm testing this stuff, here's what worked, here's what didn't." That's the sweet spot.

But here's the thing: people don't share gurus anymore. They share peers who make them feel smarter.

So the authority comes from:

• naming specific tools and constraints
• being honest about what's not solved yet
• framing trends with "we may soon see" instead of "this will change everything tomorrow"

4. A steady cadence that matches creative attention

4.0 posts per week is sneaky powerful. It's enough frequency to stay top-of-mind, but not so much that followers feel like they're drinking from a firehose.

Also, the provided best posting window is early afternoon (13:00-15:00 UTC). That's a practical hint. If your audience is global (US + Europe overlap), that window can catch multiple workdays at once.

---

Side-by-Side: The Three Creator "Engagement Engines"

Before we get into Khulan's content formula, I wanted a clean comparison. Because when three creators have almost identical Hero Scores, the question isn't "Who's best?" It's "What are they doing differently that still works?"

And notice something subtle: follower count isn't deciding the Hero Score here. Which is why Khulan is such a fun case study. The content is pulling weight.

---

Their Content Formula

Khulan's posts (based on the writing patterns you provided) are basically a repeatable product. Hook. Context. Workflow. Interpretation. CTA. It feels like a mini tutorial with a point.

Content Structure Breakdown

The Hook Pattern

Want to know what surprised me? The hook isn't trying to be clever. It's trying to be useful. It usually says, "There's no reason for X to be hard anymore" or "Are we seeing the birth of Y?"

Template:

"[Tool or trend] for [specific creative task]?"

Examples you can model (in the same vibe):

• "Gemini for motion graphics?"
• "Are we witnessing the birth of the 'AI video editor'?"
• "There is no reason for your slides to look boring..."

Why it works: it creates a clear mental movie. You instantly know if the post is for you. And if it is, you keep reading.

The Body Structure

The body is where Khulan separates from most creators. There's an opinion, but it's earned through the steps. And the transitions are clean: "Here is the workflow:" then "Takeaway:".

Body Structure Analysis:

The CTA Approach

Khulan's CTA style is really consistent, and honestly, it makes sense. The content already gave you value, so the CTA isn't begging. It's more like: "If this helped, help someone else too." That framing is psychologically clean.

Two-layer CTA pattern:

• a question to invite comments ("Want to try it?", "Has anyone else tested this?")
• the share CTA that stays nearly identical

If you want to copy the style, here's a safe template:

"Want to try it? Tell me what you get. 👇"

"Find this useful? Repost to help your network too ♻"

---

Comparison: What Each Creator Optimizes For

I kept thinking about this like product design. Each creator is optimizing for a different "success event" in the reader's mind.

And this is why their Hero Scores can sit close together even with different audiences. Engagement isn't one thing. It's "did you move the reader to act?" Just in different ways.

---

What Khulan Dav ✦ Does Better Than Most AI Creators

This is the part I keep coming back to: Khulan talks about AI like a creative director who ships.

Not like:

• a futurist
• a recruiter chasing buzzwords
• a founder doing vague thought leadership

More like: "I tried it. Here are the knobs. Here's the prompt. Here's the constraint. Here's what you'll get." That tone is rare.

A small but important detail: the content style leaves room for uncertainty. "IMHO video is still not 100% there..." is the kind of line that makes readers trust the next claim more. Because it's not pretending everything is solved.

---

3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

1. Turn one experiment into a repeatable post format - Write: hook question, 2 lines of context, 3 steps, then "Takeaway:" so people learn your rhythm.

2. Make your post skimmable on purpose - Use mini-headings like "Key highlights:" and "Takeaway:" so a fast reader still gets the point.

3. Use a two-part CTA - Ask a simple question for comments, then add a consistent repost line so shares don't feel awkward.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Khulan Dav ✦ wins with workflow clarity - the content reads like a lab notebook for creatives, not a motivational poster.
2. Giovanni Beggiato wins with outcome clarity - the value is a business result, and the CTA points to the next step.
3. Diane Massé wins with trust clarity - practical recruiting perspective stays valuable even when trends change.

That's what I learned from studying their patterns. Try one of these structures this week and see what your comments look like after. I'm curious what changes for you.

---

Meet the Creators

---

This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.