Integrating 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗥𝗔𝗚 Systems via 𝗠𝗖𝗣 👇 If you are building RAG systems and packing many data sources for retrieval, most likely there is some agency present at least at the data sour…

53439737 viral

AI Engineering16 days ago

View on LinkedIn

I have been building and operating Agentic AI Systems for the past few years and the same patterns keep emerging. 👇 𝗘𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗗𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗽𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 is the most reliable way…

47046405 viral

AI Product Development18 days ago

View on LinkedIn

You must know these 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗦𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗻𝘀 as an 𝗔𝗜 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿. If you are building Agentic Systems in an Enterprise setting you will soon discover that…

30445384 viral

Agentic AI Workflows19 days ago

View on LinkedIn

𝗠𝗖𝗣 plus 𝗔𝟮𝗔, here is how they complement each other 👇 Protocol wars continue to rage, let's understand how Googles A2A (Agent2Agent) protocol is different from MCP and how they complement eac…

30037384 viral

AI Agent Protocols23 days ago

View on LinkedIn

Fundamentals of a 𝗩𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗼𝗿 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲. With the rise of GenAI, Vector Databases skyrocketed in popularity. The truth - Vector Databases are also useful outside of a Large Language Model con…

26228263 viral

Vector Databases12 days ago

View on LinkedIn

Don't get fooled, building a 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗲 𝗥𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗮𝗹 𝗔𝘂𝗴𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 (𝗥𝗔𝗚) 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗔𝗜 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 is a challenging task. Read until the end…

21847233 viral

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)5 days ago

View on LinkedIn

Topics & Content Focus

Primary Topics

Productionizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems (retrieval design, prompt alignment, failure modes)LLMOps & AI observability (tracing, instrumentation, evaluation, monitoring, cost governance)Vector database engineering for embedding-first applications (ANN search, indexing, metadata filtering)

Secondary Themes

Developer productivity tradeoffs with AI-assisted coding (debugging burden, downstream rework)Software supply chain intelligence and OSS risk management as an AI data layerCreator-led education and community distribution (courses, event activations)

Industry Focus

GenAI application engineering for B2B software teamsLLMOps/MLOps tooling ecosystem (orchestrators, vector DBs, eval/observability stacks)Developer tooling and OSS security/compliance

Content Categories

Systems-level technical deep divesPractical production playbooks (what breaks moving prototype → production)Conceptual fundamentals/primers (teach the mental model, not just tools)Tool spotlight / partnership-led implementation narrativeCommunity + course launch announcements

Performance Insights

315.4444444444445%

Avg Engagement Rate

STABLE

Performance Trend

Best Performing Topics

Vector database fundamentals and ANN/metadata mechanics (broadly useful, highly shareable)RAG production complexity breakdowns (checklist-style, practitioner-relevant)AI observability/tracing for GenAI workflows (operational maturity content)

Virality Signals

Share-friendly structures (frameworks, step-by-step procedures, checklists)Tool-agnostic primitives (concepts that apply across stacks) outperform tool-specific promosContrarian/realism hooks increase saves/shares by validating practitioner pain

Structure & Quality

330

Avg Length (Words)

HIGH

Depth Level

ADVANCED

Expertise Level

0.78/10

Uniqueness Score

Common Hooks

Contrarian warning / myth-busting opener (signals complexity: 'don’t get fooled')Positive-to-negative flip ('X is great, but…') to frame hidden costsCredentialed assertion of necessity ('is a must-have') followed by immediate breakdownPromise of payoff if you keep reading (curiosity gap tied to practical outcome)

Common Endings

Open-ended technical question to invite peer additions ('What am I missing?')Direct prompt for reader experience sharing ('What’s your biggest pain point?')Comment-call with directional cue (👇) to lower friction

Value Delivery Methods

Decomposes complex systems into controllable components (retrieval vs generation vs ops)Provides implementation levers (chunking strategies, hybrid search choices, metadata/query paths)Operationalizes engineering concerns (cost tracing, span-level evaluation, production monitoring)Balances conceptual fundamentals with practitioner heuristics (what to tune, where failures occur)

Formatting Style

Heavy use of bold Unicode emphasis for key nouns and section headersHierarchical bulleting with arrows/checkmarks to create 'scannable' playbooksNumbered step sequences (process narratives) and lettered frameworks (system decomposition)Inline micro-definitions to teach terminology before applying it

Audience & Tone

YES

Question Usage

0.25%

Response Rate

Detected Tone

Production-minded systems engineerTeacher-operator (explains + warns about real-world failure modes)Pragmatic and slightly contrarian (cuts through hype)Tool-agnostic architect with selective tool endorsementssemi-formalmixed

Interaction Style

Peer-to-peer practitioner discussion (invites missing pieces, pain points, alternative approaches)Diagnostic prompts (readers compare their stack to the framework)Community signaling (events/courses used as relationship deepening, not only sales)

Community Building Signals

Consistent comment invitations to co-create the checklist/knowledge baseOffline community touchpoints (conference presence) used to strengthen trustEducation product ecosystem (courses) positioned as continuation of the technical narrative

Writing Style Patterns

Content Strategy

Hook: Contrarian warning / myth-busting opener (signals complexityTone: semi-formalCTA: Discussion CTA (questions designed for practitione

Writing style breakdown

Building 𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗳𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀 is not just about connecting LLMs. It is about 𝘀𝘆𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻. 👇

Most developers start by prompting an LLM to 'be an agent.' But in production, that approach fails because it lacks constraints.

If you want to build reliable systems, you need to move from 'Chat' to 'Workflows.'

Here is how I think about the 𝟯 𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 of a production-grade Agent

𝟭. 𝗗𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝘄.

➡️ Don't let the LLM decide the entire path.

➡️ Use code to define the 'rails' and let the LLM decide the 'values' within those rails.

➡️ This reduces hallucinations and ensures the system follows business logic.

𝟮. 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁.

✅ Your agent needs a 'memory' of what has happened.

✅ Use a persistent state layer to track tool outputs, user preferences, and previous errors.

✅ This allows for 'Resume-ability' when a long-running task fails.

𝟯. 𝗢𝗯𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗯𝘆 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻.

ℹ️ You cannot improve what you cannot see.

ℹ️ Instrument every tool call and every LLM interaction with traces.

ℹ️ Use these traces to build your 'Eval' set for the next iteration.

𝗧𝗶𝗽

❗️ Start with a simple 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 before moving to a fully autonomous 𝗢𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿. Complexity is the enemy of reliability.

What is the biggest challenge you have faced when moving Agents to production? Let me know in the comments 👇

Aurimas Griciūnas

Warm Analysis

Performance Overview

Top Posts by Engagement

Posting Patterns & Frequency

Best Performing Days

Best Performing Times To Post

Topics & Content Focus

Primary Topics

Secondary Themes

Industry Focus

Content Categories

Performance Insights

Best Performing Topics

Virality Signals

Structure & Quality

Common Hooks

Common Endings

Value Delivery Methods

Formatting Style

Audience & Tone

Detected Tone

Interaction Style

Community Building Signals

Writing Style Patterns

Content Strategy

Here is how I think about the 𝟯 𝗽𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗿𝘀 of a production-grade Agent

𝗧𝗶𝗽