
LinkedIn Content Strategy & Writing Style
AI & Marketing | Humans + AI > Just Humans or just AI | Flourish with AI podcast with James Clear, Gary Vaynerchuk, Neil Patel, Nir Eyal, Chris Do launching 🔜
2 people tracking this creator on Viral Brain
5.6K
4.1K
197
—
7.8
902
2
7.8 posts/week
Posts / Week
1.1 days
Days Between Posts
2
Total Posts Analyzed
HIGH
Posting Frequency
197%
Avg Engagement Rate
DECREASING
Performance Trend
180
Avg Length (Words)
HIGH
Depth Level
ADVANCED
Expertise Level
8/10
Uniqueness Score
YES
Question Usage
0.7%
Response Rate
Writing style breakdown
Predominantly conversational, social-media-native, and approachable, with a professional backbone.
Informative/analytical (especially on AI, tools, trends).
Reflective (on social norms, human experiences, emotions).
Lightly humorous and playful (jokes, made-up words, emojis).
Occasionally persuasive (particularly around CTAs and opinions).
Not academic or corporate-formal. Feels like “smart friend on LinkedIn” who thinks deeply, speaks plainly, and has taste.
Register: semi-formal conversational.
Uses contractions (“I’m”, “don’t”, “it’s”).
Sprinkles in casual phrases (“guys”, “slop”, “not that interested in boring”).
Energy: medium to high.
Posts often start with a strong, clean hook line.
Momentum builds with short paragraphs and sharp transitions.
Emotional range goes from playful and silly to genuinely uneasy or thoughtful (e.g., robots at concerts).
Very human and opinionated, but not aggressive.
Personal feelings (“Guys, I’m scared”, “I’m usually the optimistic one”).
Broader observations and pattern-spotting (“AI just made laziness scalable,” “Operators who can communicate like creators will win the next decade.”).
Uses “I” to bring in personal context, emotions, and experience.
Uses “you” and “we” to pull the reader into a shared, co-creative moment.
Direct address and questions to the audience: “How do you feel about this?”, “Agree or disagree?”, “What’s one thing you don’t want AI/robots to do for you?”
Same tools.
Completely different ways of using them.
Same tools.
Completely different careers.”
Contrast and reframing: “Slop is not a technology problem. Slop is a knowledge, skills and effort problem.”
Parallelism in lists and in “→” lines.
untooserious ← what a word!
Cognitive dissonance in 4K.
Light, not snarky.
Self-aware, often with emojis as tone softeners.
Uses “silly”, “playful”, “fun” as positive values.
Second person: “Use this to…”, “What did you feel first…?”
First person singular: “I’m scared”, “I tested 7 different prompting approaches…”
First person plural: “We’re co-creating the future together”, “Are we still too serious…?”
Direct instructions around tools/tactics: “Use this to get to know your audience…”, “Comment ‘AI’”.
Softer, exploratory questions or nudges around opinions: “How do you feel about this?”, “What did you feel first…?”
The reader is consistently treated as intelligent, curious, and collaborative rather than passive.
Overall: the style feels like a thoughtful, modern creator-operator who understands tech, cares about humanity, and speaks in platform-native language without being cringe or overhyped.
Sign in to unlock the full writing analysis
Nail your LinkedIn strategy with ViralBrain.
Analyze and write in Jacob Zangel's style. Grow your LinkedIn to the next level.