Wouter van Noort's Curator Style That Drives Reach

Wouter van Noort's "Idea Curator" Approach Is Addictive

I went down a small rabbit hole studying Wouter van Noort's LinkedIn and came back with a surprisingly clear takeaway: his feed doesn't feel like a feed. It feels like a front page that got personally edited for you. And the numbers back up the vibe: 138,593 followers, a 74.00 Hero Score, and a posting cadence of 6.3 posts per week. That's not accidental.

What caught my eye is that Wouter isn't playing the typical LinkedIn game of constant hot takes or "here's my framework" threads. He's doing something quieter and, honestly, harder: he's curating ideas, quoting great writing, framing it with crisp context, and then inviting you to go deeper. I wanted to understand why that works so well, especially compared to two other heavy hitters with very different styles: Elena Verna (Hero Score 73.00) and Dan Martell (Hero Score 72.00).

Here's what stood out:

• Wouter wins with curation + taste: short judgment, sharp framing, then the best excerpt you read all day.
• Consistency is the hidden superpower: 6+ posts a week turns good taste into a reliable habit for followers.
• All three creators sell "momentum" differently: Wouter sends you to ideas, Elena sends you to systems, Dan sends you to action.

---

Wouter van Noort's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: Wouter's Hero Score (74.00) is slightly higher than both Elena and Dan, even though his follower count is smaller than Elena's. That usually signals one thing: his audience isn't just big, it's responsive. And at 6.3 posts per week, he's not waiting around for inspiration. He's building a daily reading ritual for other people.

Key Performance Indicators

---

Quick Side-by-Side: The Three Creator "Lanes"

Before we zoom in, I found it helpful to name the lanes each creator tends to occupy. This isn't about who's "better". It's about what job their content does for the reader.

Now, here's where it gets interesting: Wouter's lane is the least common on LinkedIn. Lots of people can produce opinions. Fewer people can reliably pick the best material, summarize it, and make you feel smarter in 30 seconds.

---

What Makes Wouter van Noort's Content Work

Wouter's approach is deceptively simple. But when you break it down, there are a few very specific choices that stack the odds in his favor.

1. He Leads With Taste (Not With Ego)

So here's what he does: he starts with a clean, confident judgment like "Great report" or "This is the zeitgeist in one headline" (translated vibe), then he immediately points to the work. The center of gravity isn't "me". It's "this idea deserves your attention".

And that stance is magnetic because it feels generous. You're not trapped in someone's personal brand performance. You're being handed something worth reading.

Key Insight: Start posts with a clear editorial verdict, then deliver proof fast.

This works because people are drowning in content. A strong, concise judgment acts like a filter. And if your filter is trustworthy, followers come back daily.

Strategy Breakdown:

2. He Uses "Quote-First" Writing to Borrow Depth

A lot of LinkedIn posts pretend to be deep and end up vague. Wouter sidesteps that by quoting long, concrete passages from strong sources. He frames them with just enough context to make you care, then lets the original writing do the heavy lifting.

What's sneaky-effective about this is the reading experience: you get the dopamine of a short hook, then the satisfaction of actual substance, then a simple link if you want the full thing.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

3. He Makes Posts Feel Like a Newspaper Column (Fast, Airy, Skimmable)

I noticed how much whitespace and rhythm matters in his style. There's usually a short opener, a blank line, a block of quote, another blank line, and then a direct CTA. It's simple, but it reads clean on mobile.

And the punctuation choice matters too. The colon is doing a lot of work: "Great piece by X:" is basically a micro-format your brain learns to recognize.

If you're trying to copy one thing, copy the readability discipline. One idea per paragraph. No giant blocks. Let the reader breathe.

4. He Treats CTAs Like Service, Not Sales

Wouter's CTAs are rarely "follow me". They're more like: "Read the full piece" or "Come to the event" or "Join the conversation". That feels aligned with his role as curator.

It also means the ask doesn't trigger people's LinkedIn defenses. You're not being pitched. You're being invited.

And small detail: his likely best posting windows (based on the provided strategy hints) are morning around 08:00 and early afternoon around 14:00 local time. That matches how people actually consume curated reading: with coffee, or during a mid-day scroll break.

---

Their Content Formula

If you stripped Wouter's strongest posts to a template, it would look like "verdict - context - excerpt - handoff".

Content Structure Breakdown

The Hook Pattern

He often opens with an "editor's desk" energy. Quick. Clean. Confident.

Template:

"Excellent piece by [Author/Outlet]:"
"This is the zeitgeist in one headline."
"Still a mind-blowing statistic."

Why this works: it gives the reader an instant reason to keep going. And it sets the frame before the excerpt hits. Use it when you're sharing someone else's work, a report, a chart, or a single strong insight.

The Body Structure

The body is where he earns trust. It usually follows a repeatable path that feels almost journalistic.

Body Structure Analysis:

The CTA Approach

Wouter's CTAs are direct and visually isolated. That's important. He'll often put the CTA on its own line, then the link on the next line. No clutter.

Psychology-wise, it's a clean handoff: "If this sparked you, here's the door to the full room." Not pushy. Just obvious.

---

Wouter vs. Elena vs. Dan: Metrics That Hint at Strategy

Numbers don't tell the whole story, but they do hint at what each creator is optimizing for.

My read: all three are in the same neighborhood on engagement efficiency (Hero Score low 70s), but Wouter edges it with consistency and a distinct role. Elena wins on scale (followers). Dan wins on a clear commercial pathway (coaching and offers baked into the headline).

---

The Real Contrast: What Each Creator "Ships" Every Week

This comparison helped me a lot because it turns vague style talk into something practical.

And yes, you can blend these. But it's nice to see the difference: Wouter isn't trying to out-framework Elena or out-motivate Dan. He's building a daily habit: "come here for signal".

---

What You Can Borrow From Elena Verna and Dan Martell (Without Losing Wouter's Magic)

Even though this is a Wouter-focused breakdown, comparing him to Elena and Dan makes the edges sharper.

Elena Verna: The Operator's Clarity

Elena's vibe (based on her headline and creator archetype) is growth and execution. People follow operators because they cut through fuzziness. The implied promise is: "I'll give you a way to think about growth that you can actually apply."

If Wouter is "taste", Elena is "structure".

What Wouter could borrow from that lane (and what you can too): occasionally add a short synthesis line after an excerpt. Not a full thread, just one tight operator-style translation like "If you're building X, this implies Y".

Dan Martell: The Coach's Momentum

Dan's headline practically tells you the content path: book, AI startups, exits, and a direct DM CTA. That's creator-business alignment in plain sight.

Dan-style content tends to win when it turns motivation into a specific next action. Even his headline has an action: DM "COACH".

What Wouter could borrow from that lane (and what you can too): make the "next step" slightly more explicit sometimes. Example: instead of only "Read it in full", add "If you're leading a team, pay attention to paragraph 3". Tiny coaching energy. Same curator identity.

---

3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

1. Become a curator for a narrow theme - Pick one topic lane (policy, AI, culture, sales, leadership) and consistently share the best source plus your one-line verdict.

2. Use the "verdict - excerpt - link" format - It keeps you honest. Your verdict creates stakes, the excerpt provides substance, and the link gives an easy next step.

3. Post when people are ready to read - Try 08:00 and 14:00 local time for two weeks. Track which slot gets more saves and thoughtful comments (not just likes).

---

Key Takeaways

1. Wouter's edge is taste - He wins by being a reliable editor, not the loudest voice.
2. Consistency makes curation compound - At 6.3 posts per week, he becomes part of a follower's daily reading rhythm.
3. Whitespace is a growth tactic - His formatting makes long excerpts feel easy.
4. CTAs work best when they match your role - Curators invite, operators teach, coaches push action.

If you try one thing this week, try this: post one strong excerpt with a one-line verdict and a clean link. Then see how it feels when you stop "performing" and start editing. What do you think, does the curator lane fit you?

---

Meet the Creators

---

This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.