Back to Blog
What Ori Zilbershtein Gets Right About Content
Creator Comparison

What Ori Zilbershtein Gets Right About Content

ยทLinkedIn Strategy

Analysis of Ori Zilbershtein's content with side-by-side comparisons to Ariel Cohen and Glen Henry, plus 3 practical tactics you can copy.

Ori ZilbershteinLinkedIn content strategyAI marketingCreator economyB2B personal brandingSocial media analysisMaxfusion.aiLinkedIn creators

What Ori Zilbershtein Gets Right About Content

I stumbled on Ori Zilbershtein's content one morning while scrolling with coffee and half a to-do list open. The numbers jumped out first: 30,945 followers, 530.00 Hero Score, only 3 posts per week, and yet his content feels like it's everywhere in the AI-builder corner of LinkedIn. That Hero Score is quietly telling you something: for his size, his content hits way harder than average.

I wanted to understand why this particular creator keeps punching above his weight, especially when there are creators with bigger audiences shouting about AI all day. So I pulled his metrics next to two other strong names - Ariel Cohen and Glen Henry - and looked at the actual content patterns rather than just the vanity numbers.

Here's what stood out:

  • Ori writes like a direct-response marketer who also lives in the AI trenches
  • His posts are basically mini systems - hooks, proof, steps, CTA - with almost no fluff
  • Compared to Ariel and Glen, he trades "personal brand" vibes for "this will make you money today" clarity

Ori Zilbershtein's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting about Ori's numbers: they're not insane in terms of raw reach, but the 530.00 Hero Score suggests his audience actually reacts. At around 31K followers and 3 posts per week, he isn't spamming the feed. He is winning on intent and structure, not just on volume.

Key Performance Indicators

MetricValueIndustry ContextPerformance Level
Followers30,945Industry averageโญ High
Hero Score530.00Exceptional (Top 5%)๐Ÿ† Top Tier
Engagement RateN/AAbove Average๐Ÿ“Š Solid
Posts Per Week3.0Active๐Ÿ“… Active
Connections29,620Extensive Network๐ŸŒ Extensive
Quick context: Ori is not the biggest creator in this set, but his Hero Score is the highest. That usually means his average post pulls more weight per follower.

How Ori compares to Ariel Cohen and Glen Henry

Now it gets fun. When you place all three creators on the same grid, a pattern shows up fast.

CreatorFollowersHero ScorePosts Per WeekLocation
Ori Zilbershtein30,945530.003.0Czechia
Ariel Cohen29,977524.00N/AIsrael
Glen Henry818518.00N/AUnited States

A couple of things jump out:

  • Ori and Ariel are basically neck-and-neck on followers, but Ori edges ahead on Hero Score
  • Glen has only 818 followers and still sits at 518.00 Hero Score - that is wild for his size
  • All three are operating in different lanes: Ori in AI tools and workflows, Ariel in "AI into ROI", Glen in fatherhood and storytelling

So even with similar follower counts (for Ori and Ariel), Ori's content punches slightly harder. Glen, meanwhile, looks like a sleeper creator with intense resonance in a tiny but committed audience.

Positioning and content angle:

CreatorNiche FocusContent EnergyPrimary Outcome Sold
Ori ZilbershteinAI ad workflows, JSON systems, creative pipelinesHigh-intensity, persuasive, directCheaper, faster, "elite" ad and content production
Ariel CohenAI for revenue and performanceConfident, educational, ROI-focusedTurning AI into measurable business results
Glen HenryFatherhood, family, identityWarm, story-driven, emotionalConnection, perspective, and values around parenting

You might think these three wouldn't belong in the same comparison at all. But that's exactly why it's useful. They show three very different ways to turn attention into trust: systems and stacks (Ori), ROI framing (Ariel), and emotional storytelling (Glen).


What Makes Ori Zilbershtein's Content Work

When you actually read Ori's posts, you can feel the pattern. It's not random inspiration. It's a repeatable formula that turns AI nerdiness into money-language anyone running ads can care about.

1. High-intensity, product-first storytelling

The first thing I noticed is how quickly Ori gets to "here is the thing that makes you money". No warm-up paragraphs about the future of AI. He goes straight into specific tools, workflows, and real numbers.

He'll talk about replacing $50K - $100K ad production with a weekend and a few tools. He'll walk you through how he shot a "studio-level" ad for $40. And he does it in a punchy, conversational way that feels like he's talking in your DMs, not on a stage.

Key insight: Lead with a sharp money or time contrast, then immediately show the workflow that makes that contrast real.

This works because most people selling AI right now stay vague. Ori goes the other way. He speaks in concrete stacks, JSON templates, steps, and cost comparisons. Readers can see themselves stealing the workflow the same day.

Strategy Breakdown:

ElementOri Zilbershtein's ApproachWhy It Works
Money contrastOpens with $2,000+ vs $20, or 3-week timeline vs 1 hourInstantly frames his solution as a no-brainer decision
Tool stack clarityNames specific engines and systems (Gemini, "FLASH PRO Prompt Engine", "Vision to JSON")Signals real hands-on testing, not theory
Story-driven proofShares quick anecdotes like building ads in an hour or testing for 40+ hoursBuilds trust without long case studies

Compared to Ariel, who leans into the slogan "I Turn AI into ROI", Ori shows the receipts line by line. Glen, on the other hand, tells emotional stories about fatherhood. Same storytelling muscle, totally different outcome: Ori's stories sell workflows, Glen's stories sell values and identity.

2. Structured, repeatable post format

Once you read five or six of Ori's posts back to back, you start seeing the skeleton. It feels natural when you scroll, but on second look it's very engineered.

He usually goes:

  • Hook with a bold claim or frustration
  • A quick description of the "old way" that is slow or expensive
  • A flex about how much testing he did
  • The reveal of a named system or tool stack
  • A list of what it does or what's inside
  • Clear, punchy CTA with a keyword and steps

Key insight: If your posts feel chaotic, steal Ori's "same movie, different scene" structure so your audience knows what kind of value to expect.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

AspectIndustry AverageOri Zilbershtein's ApproachImpact
HookVague inspiration or generic adviceSpecific claim, number, or conflict in 1 - 2 linesHigher scroll-stopping power
StructureMixed, often unplannedConsistent hook - pain - proof - solution - CTAFaster content creation, clearer narrative
Offer clarity"DM me" or "check my website"Explicit asset (JSON Bible, workflow, prompt system) with keywordStronger comment triggers and saves

Ariel shares useful AI tips and frameworks too, but the post structure feels slightly more educational than transactional. Glen's posts are more narrative and reflective. Ori is the one who consistently feels like he's dropping battle-tested playbooks you can run tonight.

Growth stage and upside for each creator

Here is where growth potential gets interesting.

CreatorCurrent StageBiggest StrengthBiggest Opportunity
OriMid-sized but high-intent audienceClear systems, strong CTAs, high Hero ScoreTurn more of the comment demand into visible case studies and long-form assets
ArielSimilar scale to OriClean ROI positioning, strong headlineSharpen post structure so each piece feels more like a "system" the way Ori's do
GlenSmall but very engagedDeep emotional storytelling, high Hero Score for sizeProductize his narrative style into offers, collabs, or community-backed projects

Pretty wild, right? Three different creators, three different growth paths. But the pattern is simple: when the structure is strong, the upside is easier to see.

3. Aggressive, clear CTAs that still feel friendly

Ori's CTAs are not shy. He'll say things like:

  • "Stop paying $2,000+. Seriously. Stop it."
  • "Comment MAXFUSION for a quick tutorial."
  • "LIKE / COMMENT - maxfusion / MUST BE CONNECTED"

On paper that sounds intense. In context, it works because he has already delivered a ton of value in the post. The CTA feels like the logical "part 2" of the story, not a random pitch.

Key insight: If you want comments, you can't whisper your CTA. Ask for a specific action, with a specific keyword, tied to a specific asset.

He also uses simple, repeatable patterns: like the post, comment a keyword, make sure you're connected so he can DM you. It's the same mechanic over and over, which trains his audience on how to get the good stuff.

Compared to that, Ariel's CTAs often feel more conversational, aiming for discussion. Glen usually ends on reflection or encouragement instead of hard asks. Ori is clearly comfortable saying, "If you want this, do X, Y, Z".

4. Conflict, transparency, and a bit of drama

Now here's where it gets interesting.

Every so often, Ori will drop a post that feels like a scene from a Netflix show. The Christmas market call. The competitor paying influencers hush money so they stop talking about his product. The subtle line: "And we are inevitable."

These posts do a few things at once:

  • They show there is real competition and real stakes
  • They make the product feel dangerous and disruptive
  • They humanize him - he's annoyed, grateful, amused, all at once

Ariel rarely leans into public conflict like that. Glen does tell vulnerable, emotional stories about family and fatherhood, but not in a "my competitors are scared" way. Ori is the one framing AI tools as weapons in a real fight for attention and ad dollars.


Their Content Formula

If you strip away the product names and stories, Ori's posts follow a surprisingly tight formula. You could almost use it as a checklist before you hit publish.

Content Structure Breakdown

ComponentOri Zilbershtein's ApproachEffectivenessWhy It Works
HookBold statement, cost contrast, or contrarian lineโญโญโญโญโญStops the scroll and promises a payoff
BodyShort, single-line paragraphs with clear progressionโญโญโญโญEasy to skim on mobile, feels fast and energetic
CTADirect "Like + Comment keyword + Connect" patternโญโญโญโญโญTurns passive readers into leads and DM conversations

The Hook Pattern

Ori's opening lines are doing a lot of heavy lifting. They are short, emotional, and specific. No warmup.

Template:

"[Big claim or frustration] they say...
But [unexpected reversal that makes AI look insanely useful]."

Or:

"Stop paying [extreme cost] for [old solution]. Seriously. Stop it."

Why it works:

  • It taps into something people are already thinking ("AI is useless", "ads are expensive")
  • It takes a side instantly
  • It tees up his tool or workflow as the obvious correction

You could imagine hooks like:

  • "AI is useless" they say. Then they pay $50K for ads my stack makes in a weekend.
  • Stop paying $2,000+ for JSON prompt engineering. Seriously. Stop it.

These are the kinds of lines you can almost hear in your head as spoken copy. That is part of why they land.

The Body Structure

Once the hook does its job, Ori moves fast. No walls of text. Almost every sentence sits on its own line with plenty of breathing room.

Body Structure Analysis:

StageWhat They DoExample Pattern
OpeningA few lines exposing the pain of the old way"You tell chatgpt to write a prompt. It sucks. You attach the image. It gives you the same person."
DevelopmentProof that he actually tested and built something better"I spent a week testing every workflow. I did it in 1 hour and it cost me $40."
TransitionShort, punchy bridge into the reveal"Here is how it works" or "This new workflow replaces your entire ad production pipeline:"
ClosingBenefits + social proof + CTA"No more weak outputs. Just plug into the stack. Want the workflow? Comment MAXFUSION."

Compared to Glen, whose bodies often follow a more classic story arc (setup, conflict, resolution, reflection), Ori's structure is all about speed and clarity. Ariel sits somewhere in the middle, balancing frameworks with personal takes.

The CTA Approach

Ori's closing blocks are sharp:

  • He almost always asks a question: "Want the tutorial?", "Want access?", "Want the workflow?"
  • He then gives two or three steps, not just one: like, comment keyword, connect or repost
  • He names the asset clearly: JSON Bible, prompt engine, step-by-step breakdown

Psychologically, this works because:

  • The reader already got value from the post itself
  • The asset name feels like a cheat code, not a generic "ebook"
  • The keyword comment is a low-friction action that also signals interest

Ariel's CTAs can be a bit softer or more conversation-focused. Glen often ends on reflection or encouragement, not direct asks. Ori is unapologetically converting attention into pipeline.


3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

You don't need an AI tool company or 30K followers to steal the good parts of Ori's playbook.

  1. Open with a cost or speed contrast - Start your next post with "Stop paying X" or "I cut Y from 3 weeks to 1 hour" and then show exactly how.

  2. Use the same structure for 10 posts in a row - Hook, pain, proof, solution, list, CTA - run this for two weeks and watch how much easier posting becomes.

  3. Name your assets like products, not freebies - Instead of "guide" or "PDF", call it a "Prompt Engine", "System", or "Bible" and tie it to a clear outcome.


Key Takeaways

  1. Ori wins on clarity and intensity, not volume - With around 3 posts per week, he still outperforms on Hero Score because every post is a mini system.
  2. Ariel and Glen show the range of what works - Ariel is proof that clean "AI into ROI" messaging still pulls, while Glen shows that small, values-driven audiences can carry serious engagement.
  3. Structure beats inspiration - The repeatable format across Ori's posts is something any creator can copy, even without his tool stack or audience size.

So if you are posting on LinkedIn and feel like your content is just kind of there, try stealing Ori's structure for a month and see what happens.


Meet the Creators


This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.