TAHER A. BAHASHWAN's High-Frequency AI Posts

TAHER A. BAHASHWAN's Fast, Teacher-Style Tech Content

I stumbled onto TAHER A. BAHASHWAN while looking at creators who get strong engagement without having a huge audience. And I had to double-take: 1,373 followers, nearly 10 posts per week, and a Hero Score of 44.00.

That combo is rare. Most people either post a lot with average response, or post occasionally with a big spike when the topic hits. Taher is doing something different: he posts like a builder who teaches in public, in small, structured lessons that feel made for busy professionals.

So I wanted to understand what makes his content work, and what changes when you compare him to two very different creators with the same Hero Score: Haris Odobasic (B2B growth vibes, bigger base) and Codie A. Sanchez (massive audience, business acquisition education). Turns out, the similarities are surprisingly useful.

Here's what stood out:

• Same Hero Score, totally different scale - which tells you the "engine" is format and clarity, not just audience size.
• Taher's repeatable teaching template (hook - analogy - timeline - why teams care - future) is built for LinkedIn scanning.
• Volume is the strategy - but it's not random volume. It's disciplined, modular publishing.

---

TAHER A. BAHASHWAN's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: with just 1,373 followers, Taher is still showing a Top Tier Hero Score (44.00). That usually means the audience he does have is the right audience, and the posts consistently give them something they can save, share, or comment on. And the cadence - 9.8 posts per week - is basically a daily publishing habit with extra bursts. Pretty impressive, right?

Key Performance Indicators

Now, here comes the part that surprised me.

All three creators have the same Hero Score (44.00), despite wildly different follower counts. That makes this less about popularity and more about "fit" - message, format, and consistency matching what the audience wants.

Side-by-side snapshot (same score, different game)

My take: Hero Score being equal hints that each creator has found a reliable content-to-audience match. They just play in different "attention markets".

---

What Makes TAHER A. BAHASHWAN's Content Work

Taher's content is technical, but it doesn't feel like a lecture. It feels like a smart colleague who enjoys explaining things and has a system for doing it.

And yes, the system is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

1. He teaches advanced topics with simple mental models

So here's what he does: he starts with an analogy that makes the concept stick, then he maps that analogy to real infrastructure and AI concepts. That instantly lowers the reader's effort. Instead of "decode tokens per second" anxiety, you get a picture in your head.

You see this a lot in his style: restaurant kitchens, spotlights, sculptors, committees. It's not fluff. It's a shortcut into understanding.

Key Insight: Pick one analogy that a busy engineer or manager can repeat in a meeting, then build the technical detail under it.

This works because LinkedIn is not a textbook environment. People are scrolling between meetings. If your first 4 lines make them feel smart instead of lost, they keep reading.

Strategy Breakdown:

2. He uses a repeatable structure that trains the audience

Once you notice it, you can't unsee it. Many posts follow a predictable flow:

• A bold title line (often with an emoji)
• A separator
• A quick framing question
• A simple analogy
• Origin and milestones timeline
• "What it does" bullets
• "Why teams care" bullets
• "Where this is heading" bullets
• Hashtags

People like patterns. They make reading feel safe and fast. And Taher is basically teaching his followers, "This is how my posts work, so you can skim confidently." That is a real advantage.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

And here's the sneaky benefit: a template makes high-frequency posting possible without burning out.

3. He makes it about "teams" and decisions, not just tech trivia

Want to know what makes technical content shareable? When it helps someone justify a decision.

Taher frequently frames sections as "Why Teams Care Today". That phrase does a lot. It signals practicality and speaks to the reality that most readers are building systems with constraints: cost, latency, security, and stakeholder expectations.

It also keeps the post from becoming a Wikipedia summary. Even when he goes deep, he brings it back to the job.

4. He posts like a newsroom, not like a diarist

This one is simple but powerful: 9.8 posts per week means he is showing up constantly. But the posts are not "what I did today" updates. They are small, topic-driven explainers.

That changes the feel of the feed. If someone follows him for NVIDIA stack clarity or cloud networking context, they get multiple chances per week to bump into a useful lesson.

And timing matters too. With best windows listed as morning around 09:00 (Asia/Riyadh) and 15:00 to 19:00 (Asia/Riyadh), the strategy lines up with when professionals check LinkedIn: before the day fully starts and when work begins to slow down.

---

Their Content Formula

Taher basically runs a "mini course" through posts. Each post stands alone, but together they build a library.

Content Structure Breakdown

The Hook Pattern

He often opens with a concept label plus a simple claim or question.

Template:

"🧠 [Concept]: The Engine Behind [Outcome]"

Two example variations you can copy (in his spirit):

"🤖 Transformers: Why they changed everything"

"🧪 KV Cache: What's really speeding up your LLM inference?"

Why this hook works: it promises an explanation, not a hot take. And for technical audiences, that is honestly refreshing.

The Body Structure

He keeps the middle skimmable and predictable.

Body Structure Analysis:

If you write technical posts, this structure is gold because it helps both readers: the skimmer and the deep reader.

The CTA Approach

Taher doesn't do hard CTAs. No "book a call" energy. Instead, he closes with:

• A short "map" sentence
• A "continue in comments" style tease
• Hashtags for discovery

The psychology is simple: he is not asking for a transaction. He's training for trust. And trust is what drives DMs and referrals later.

---

Where Taher differs from Haris and Codie (and what to steal)

This is where the comparison gets fun. Same Hero Score, different playbooks.

Table: Content positioning and audience promise

Now, here's where it gets interesting.

Taher is closer to a "curriculum creator". Codie is closer to a "movement creator". Haris is closer to a "operator creator". All three can win. You just have to pick which lane matches your real strengths.

Table: Scale vs posting intensity (what we can and can't infer)

Important point: you don't need a massive audience to have high relative engagement. But you do need a clear "why follow".

Table: Style and format choices

---

3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

1. Steal the "Analogy - Timeline - Teams" sequence - It gets attention, builds trust, and ends with real-world relevance.

2. Post in modules, not masterpieces - A 300 to 600 word lesson with clear headings beats a 2,000 word brain dump on LinkedIn.

3. Aim for predictable formatting - When readers know where the "Why it matters" section will be, they read longer.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Hero Score parity is the clue - You can earn strong engagement at any follower count if your format matches your audience.
2. Taher's edge is structural clarity - The repeated template makes complex topics feel simple and shareable.
3. High frequency works when the content is modular - His cadence is sustainable because the posts are built from a consistent blueprint.

If you try one thing, try this: write one post this week that teaches a hard concept using a simple analogy, then end with "Why teams care". See what happens.

---

Meet the Creators

---

This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.