Sanchit Narula's Content Hits Like Real Mentorship

I stumbled on Sanchit Narula's LinkedIn and had that quiet, annoying thought: "Wait - why does this feel so readable?" Not polished. Not corporate. Just... alive. And then I saw the numbers: 28,599 followers, a 155.00 Hero Score, and a posting pace of 8.4 posts per week. That's not accidental.

So I did what any curious person would do over coffee - I compared him to two other creators with almost the same engagement horsepower: Patrick Spychalski (154.00 Hero Score) and Daniel Korenblum (154.00 Hero Score). Different niches, different vibes, similar ability to make people stop scrolling. And a few patterns jumped out fast.

Here's what stood out:

Sanchit writes like a senior engineer who actually cares - tough love + clarity + stories that teach
He wins with structure and rhythm (tiny paragraphs, punch lines, repeatable patterns), not fancy production
The consistency is serious - high frequency + early morning timing gives him more "surface area" for wins

Sanchit Narula's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: Sanchit's audience is not the biggest of the three, but his Hero Score is the highest. That usually means one thing - the content is doing more work than the follower count suggests. He's not just broadcasting. He's triggering replies, saves, shares, and "this is so true" DMs.

Key Performance Indicators

Metric	Value	Industry Context	Performance Level
Followers	28,599	Industry average	⭐ High
Hero Score	155.00	Exceptional (Top 5%)	🏆 Top Tier
Engagement Rate	N/A	Above Average	📊 Solid
Posts Per Week	8.4	Very Active	⚡ Very Active
Connections	5,187	Growing Network	🔗 Growing

Quick gut-check: A **155 Hero Score** with "only" **28.6k followers** is a sign the writing itself is pulling weight. That's the part you can copy.

What Makes Sanchit Narula's Content Work

Sanchit's content doesn't feel like "content." It feels like that one coworker who tells you the truth without making you feel small. And he does it with repeatable moves.

1. He teaches through real pressure, not theory

The first thing I noticed is how often Sanchit uses high-stakes engineering moments (outages, legacy code, career plateaus, health hits) as the entry point.

He doesn't start with "Here are 5 tips." He starts with a moment.

A pager goes off.
Something breaks.
Someone panics.
And then he zooms out into a lesson you can actually use.

Key Insight: Turn stressful work moments into mentoring posts - story first, principles second.

This works because people don't remember frameworks.

They remember feelings. The "oh no" moment. The silence in the room. The relief when it's fixed. And then they remember what you said to do next time.

Strategy Breakdown:

Element	Sanchit Narula's Approach	Why It Works
Stakes	Uses production incidents, career decisions, health tradeoffs	Stakes create attention without clickbait
Specificity	Concrete details, simple language, no jargon flexing	Readers trust what they can picture
Lesson pivot	"Here's what I learned" shift into bullets	Turns a story into a reusable checklist

2. He writes like a human (and keeps it brutally readable)

Sanchit has this mentoring vibe that doesn't sound rehearsed. It's conversational, a little spicy, and it uses the "Indian internet" cadence in a way that feels natural.

He'll drop lines like:

"Bro, stop feeling sorry for yourself."
"Tools badal rahe hain. Lekin seekhna aur sochna abhi bhi tumhe khud hi padega."

And instead of alienating people, it pulls the right people closer.

Because the voice is consistent.

And the formatting is built for scrolling: short paragraphs, blank lines, punch lines, contrast pairs.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

Aspect	Industry Average	Sanchit Narula's Approach	Impact
Tone	Neutral, "professional"	Casual-professional, tough love	Feels like advice from a real senior
Paragraph length	Dense blocks	1-2 sentence paragraphs	Faster skimming, more retention
Credibility	Claims and opinions	Stories + concrete examples	Higher trust, more comments

3. High frequency, but not mindless frequency

8.4 posts per week is a lot. And honestly, most people can't do that without turning into noise.

But here's the thing: his posts often follow a few repeatable structures, so he's not reinventing the wheel every time. He's rotating formats.

Story - lesson - bullet list - closing punch
Hot take - nuance - consequences - reframe - advice
One observation - joke - quick reflection

That makes the volume sustainable.

It also gives followers pattern recognition. They know what kind of value they're about to get.

4. He optimizes for the comment section, not vanity applause

This one surprised me a bit.

A lot of LinkedIn creators chase "agree" reactions. Sanchit often writes in a way that invites response:

Rhetorical questions
Strong stances with nuance
"Don't be that engineer" style identity calls

And crucially, his CTAs are rarely promotional.

They're behavioral.

That creates a different kind of relationship with the audience. People don't feel marketed to. They feel coached.

Their Content Formula

If you want to borrow something from Sanchit without copying his life story, borrow his structure.

Content Structure Breakdown

Component	Sanchit Narula's Approach	Effectiveness	Why It Works
Hook	Punchy first line, often a story moment or hot take	High	Stops scroll fast, sets stakes
Body	Short paragraphs + escalation + bullets	Very high	Easy to skim, hard to ignore
CTA	Reflective question or blunt advice	High	Drives comments without begging

The Hook Pattern

Want to know what surprised me? His hooks are rarely "clever." They're direct.

They usually sound like:

"I hate legacy code. You hate legacy code."
"Everyone wants the big package. Nobody wants the years."
"True story. This happened at 8 PM on a Tuesday."

Template:

"[Blunt truth or real moment].

[1 line that makes the stakes obvious]."

Why it works: you're not decoding anything. You're in the scene immediately.

And the hook doesn't overpromise. It just starts.

The Body Structure

He builds like an engineer debugging a system:

Start with what happened
Narrow the problem
Pull out principles
Make it about you

Body Structure Analysis:

Stage	What They Do	Example Pattern
Opening	Time/place + tension	"On a Tuesday, 8 PM, pager goes off"
Development	Step-by-step, short lines	"Logs. Queries. Nothing obvious."
Transition	Clear pivot to lesson	"Here's what I learned that night:"
Closing	Identity statement + punch line	"Outages don't ruin careers. Lack of ownership does."

The CTA Approach

Sanchit's CTAs are basically mini coaching moments.

Instead of "Follow for more," you'll see:

"Don't be that engineer."
"Protect your body like you protect your codebase."
"What do you think about this?"

Psychologically, this is smart because it respects the reader.

It assumes the reader is capable of action, not just consumption.

Side-by-Side: Why These Three All Win (Differently)

Now, here's where it gets interesting.

Sanchit, Patrick, and Daniel have almost the same Hero Score band, but they earn it in different ways.

Creator	Followers	Hero Score	Likely Core Advantage	Risk If Overdone
Sanchit Narula	28,599	155.00	Relatable mentorship through real engineering life	Can burn out on volume if not careful
Patrick Spychalski	20,887	154.00	Founder clarity and practical business framing	Can drift into "founder quotes" if too abstract
Daniel Korenblum	68,292	154.00	Branded content expertise, clear positioning	Can sound repetitive if templates aren't refreshed

What I like about this comparison is it shows you don't need the biggest audience.

Daniel has more than 2x Sanchit's followers, but their Hero Scores are basically tied.

So the game is not "get big then get engagement."

The game is "earn attention with consistency and clarity, then scale."

My take: Sanchit's edge is trust. Patrick's edge is founder perspective. Daniel's edge is positioning and repeatable content systems. Different routes. Same destination.

Posting cadence and timing (the underrated advantage)

We only have an explicit "best posting time" hint here: early morning (around 4-6 AM, Asia/Kolkata).

But think about the behavior:

Early morning posts catch commuters, gym scrollers, and "before standup" readers.
High frequency means more experiments.
And LinkedIn rewards consistency even when a few posts flop.

Here's a clean comparison snapshot:

Creator	Time zone signal	Posting style vibe	Likely audience moment
Sanchit	Asia/Kolkata early mornings	Engineer-coach, story + lessons	"Start my day smarter"
Patrick	US-based	Founder framing, business intuition	"Between meetings"
Daniel	Europe-based	Branding and client-focused content	"Workday content planning"

What Sanchit Does Better Than Most Creators (Even Good Ones)

This is the part that made me a little jealous (in a good way).

Sanchit consistently balances three things most people struggle to hold at the same time:

Authority (ex-Amazon, senior engineering context)
Warmth (mentoring, "I've been there")
Edge (hot takes, contrast, punch lines)

A lot of creators pick one:

Authority only - boring.
Warmth only - forgettable.
Edge only - exhausting.

Sanchit blends all three.

And he does it without sounding like he's trying to "build a brand." He just sounds like himself.

3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

Write from your worst day at work - one real incident + 3 lessons beats 20 generic tips every time.
Use a repeatable post skeleton - story - lesson - bullets - punch line makes consistency easier than motivation.
End with a behavioral CTA - ask for a decision ("Do this") or a reflection ("What do you think?") instead of begging for likes.

Key Takeaways

Hero Score rewards trust, not just reach - Sanchit proves a mid-sized audience can hit top-tier engagement.
Structure is a superpower - short paragraphs, clear pivots, and lists are not "stylistic" - they're distribution tools.
Your voice is the differentiator - Hinglish, humor, tough love, whatever fits you, as long as it's consistent.
Consistency beats intensity - 8.4 posts per week is not magic, but it creates more chances to learn what lands.

If you try one thing from this, try writing one post this week that sounds like you talking to a friend, not you presenting to a room. Then watch what happens. What do you think?