René van der Zel's Leadership Diary Content Playbook

René van der Zel's calm, consistent way to win attention

I stumbled on René van der Zel's LinkedIn and had one of those "wait, how is this working so well?" moments. He's sitting at 110,530 followers and a 117.00 Hero Score, posting around 5.9 times per week. That's not just big - it's unusually efficient attention for someone who isn't relying on hypey one-liners or viral controversy.

So I went looking for the pattern. I wanted to understand what makes his posts feel like a quick chat with a smart operator (instead of a polished brand update), and why people keep coming back for the next episode. And once you compare him side-by-side with Emilia Möller and Michel Lieben 🧠, the differences get even more interesting.

Here's what stood out:

• René wins with serial storytelling - he turns business operations into an ongoing diary people want to follow.
• He writes with human credibility (hedges, humor, small imperfections) while still delivering real substance.
• His cadence is aggressive, but the tone stays relaxed - which makes frequent posting feel like presence, not noise.

---

René van der Zel's Performance Metrics

What's interesting is that René's numbers point to a creator who is both high-volume and high-connection. That mix is hard to pull off: when you post a lot, quality usually dips or the voice becomes repetitive. But a 117.00 Hero Score next to 110k+ followers suggests he isn't just broadcasting - he's keeping people emotionally and intellectually engaged.

Key Performance Indicators

---

What Makes René van der Zel's Content Work

Before we get tactical, I want to show you the quick competitive snapshot, because it frames René's edge really clearly.

Creator Snapshot (side-by-side)

Now, here are the strategies that (in my opinion) make René the one to study if you're trying to build trust at scale.

1. He writes like a builder, not a marketer

So here's what he does that a lot of executives don't: he narrates the messy middle. Not just the win, but the decision-making behind it. Budget pressure, attribution confusion, the reality of multiple channels telling different stories - he puts it on the table in plain language.

And he does it with tiny honesty signals: quick admissions ("Honestly..."), soft qualifiers ("I think", "as far as I can tell"), and light humor. Those little choices make the reader feel safe. Like, "Ok, this person isn't performing. They're thinking out loud." Pretty powerful.

Key Insight: Write from the operator's seat: "Here's what we're trying, what's annoying about it, and what we will change next week."

This works because LinkedIn is full of conclusions. René shares process. And process is where trust gets built.

Strategy Breakdown:

2. He turns business updates into a series people follow

I noticed René doesn't treat posts as one-offs. He treats them like chapters. He'll share what they're changing, what they're watching, and then he leaves a thread hanging with something like "I'll share the learnings" or the classic "To be continued...."

That is such a simple retention trick, but it works because it matches how people actually consume LinkedIn - they remember you as a storyline, not a single post.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

And this is where comparing him to Emilia and Michel is useful.

• Emilia Möller often wins with idea density. AI and discoverability lends itself to frameworks, predictions, and "here's the shift" posts. Her high Hero Score (116.0) suggests she is nailing relevance.
• Michel Lieben 🧠 often wins with systems thinking. GTM systems, outbound, and productized insight tends to attract builders and operators. His Hero Score (112.0) is still strong, but the audience is usually more specialized.
• René sits in a sweet spot: leadership and entrepreneurship are broad themes, but he anchors them in very specific, lived operations.

3. He uses "small" language that signals confidence

This part surprised me. René doesn't sound overly certain. He uses language like "in any case" and "I guess" (translated from his Dutch style), and sometimes he corrects himself mid-sentence.

You'd think that would reduce authority. But it does the opposite because it feels like real thinking. He isn't writing to win an argument. He's writing to share reality.

And compared to many creators who sound like they're always teaching from a stage, René sounds like he's talking beside you.

4. He posts a lot, but he keeps the reading effort low

5.9 posts per week is a serious pace. That can easily turn into spam. But his formatting saves him: short opening, quick context, then dense middle blocks (still readable because the tone is light), then a short landing at the end.

Also, best posting time guidance shows 06:00-07:00. That fits the "coffee scroll" moment where people want something useful but not overwhelming.

Posting posture comparison

---

Their Content Formula

René's posts often feel like this: a curious hook, a conversational build, a compressed "here's the real mess" middle, and a soft ending that invites either a reply or a return visit.

Content Structure Breakdown

The Hook Pattern

He often opens by naming an annoying business truth or asking a question that sounds like something you'd say to a friend.

Template:

"Honestly, I used to think [topic] was overhyped... but now we can't ignore it."

A few variations that match his style:

"So... how do you actually measure what's working when every channel claims the win?"

"I laughed when I saw this. And then I realized it says something about how we work."

This hook works because it starts with curiosity, not certainty. People don't feel preached at. They feel invited in.

The Body Structure

René tends to move through a simple progression: set the scene, add messy details, then share what changed.

Body Structure Analysis:

Now, here's where it gets interesting: this structure makes him feel both competent and human. And that's the rare combo that gets shared.

The CTA Approach

René's CTAs aren't pushy. They are social, casual, and easy to respond to:

• A simple question: "Did anyone see this?"
• A light invite: "If you're around, come by."
• A serial closer: "I'll share learnings soon. To be continued...."

The psychology is straightforward: if the ask is small, more people say yes. And even if someone doesn't comment, they still feel like they are part of the story.

---

What René does better than equally strong creators

Because Emilia and Michel are strong creators too, it helps to be specific about the differences.

Engagement efficiency signals

If I had to summarize it: Emilia earns attention with sharp thinking, Michel earns it with repeatable systems, and René earns it with consistency plus real-life texture.

---

3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

1. Write one post as an "operator log" - share what you're trying, what's annoying, and what you will change next week (people trust process).

2. End with a low-pressure close - ask a simple question or tease the follow-up so your audience has a reason to return.

3. Front-load clarity, then add the messy detail - one short hook paragraph, one longer context paragraph, then your densest insight in the middle.

---

Key Takeaways

1. Consistency beats theatrics - René posts frequently, but keeps it human, so it doesn't feel like content spam.
2. Specificity creates trust - naming real constraints (measurement, attribution, channel bias) makes advice believable.
3. Serial storytelling builds retention - "To be continued" is simple, but it turns your profile into a series.

That's what I learned from studying René (and checking him against Emilia and Michel). Try one small change this week and see what your comments look like.

---

Meet the Creators

---

This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.