
Nikola Ilic's Quietly Powerful Leadership Content
A close look at Nikola Ilic's LinkedIn playbook, plus side-by-side comparisons with Kieran Flanagan and Richard Tromans.
Nikola Ilic's Quiet Formula for High-Trust Growth
I was scrolling LinkedIn and stumbled on something that made me stop mid-swipe: Nikola Ilic has 5,159 followers, posts about 5 times per week, and still clocks a Hero Score of 41.00.
That combo is not common. Smaller audience, high relative engagement, and a cadence that screams "I take this seriously." So I got curious. What is he doing that works so well? And how does it compare to creators who operate at a totally different scale, like Kieran Flanagan (101,708 followers) and Richard Tromans (17,300 followers)?
Here's what stood out:
- Nikola wins with identity-first leadership coaching, not hot takes.
- All three creators share the same Hero Score (41.00), but they earn it with totally different content engines.
- Nikola's structure is doing a lot of heavy lifting - hooks you can feel, frameworks you can reuse, and CTAs that don't feel salesy.
Nikola Ilic's Performance Metrics
Here's what's interesting: Nikola's numbers suggest a creator who's built trust density. When someone with 5k followers can keep pace with much bigger accounts on relative engagement (Hero Score), it's usually because the content is consistent, repeatable, and emotionally resonant - the kind of stuff people save, share, and come back to when they're planning their week.
Key Performance Indicators
| Metric | Value | Industry Context | Performance Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | 5,159 | Industry average | ๐ Growing |
| Hero Score | 41.00 | Exceptional (Top 5%) | ๐ Top Tier |
| Engagement Rate | N/A | Above Average | ๐ Solid |
| Posts Per Week | 5.0 | Active | ๐ Active |
| Connections | 4,490 | Growing Network | ๐ Growing |
Now, let's put Nikola next to Kieran and Richard, because this is where the story gets fun.
| Creator | Followers | Hero Score | Location | What they are known for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Ilic | 5,159 | 41.00 | United States | Leadership frameworks, identity-based growth, action learning |
| Kieran Flanagan | 101,708 | 41.00 | Ireland | Marketing leadership, AI commentary, growth takes |
| Richard Tromans | 17,300 | 41.00 | United Kingdom | Legal tech and AI, sharp industry analysis |
Three creators. Same relative engagement score. Totally different lanes.
What Makes Nikola Ilic's Content Work
Nikola's content feels like a coach who respects your time. It's not fluffy. It's not "10 hacks." It's more like: "Here's the mental shift that changes how you lead." And because he posts frequently, those shifts compound.
1. He sells identity, not information
So here's what he does: he doesn't just teach "do X." He frames leadership as "become Y." That subtle move makes the content stick, because you're not arguing about tactics - you're reflecting on who you are becoming.
You'll see this pattern constantly: outcome vs process vs identity, short-term vs long-term, urgent vs important. It's basically leadership journaling, packaged as a post.
Key Insight: If you want repeat engagement, write so the reader thinks, "This is about me," not "This is about them."
This works because identity is emotional. And emotion is memorable. People might forget a list of tips, but they won't forget a post that makes them ask, "Am I leading like the person I want to be in 5 years?"
Strategy Breakdown:
| Element | Nikola Ilic's Approach | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Identity framing | "Who do I need to become?" as the core question | Triggers self-reflection and saves/shares |
| Contrasts | Outcome vs Process vs Identity | Makes ideas feel clear and teachable |
| Second-person coaching | Heavy use of "you" | Feels personal, not broadcasted |
2. He writes in reusable frameworks (and repeats them on purpose)
A lot of creators fear repeating themselves. Nikola doesn't. And honestly, that's a sign of confidence.
He introduces a framework, labels it, then comes back to it from different angles. That repetition builds recognition. Readers start to know what they're getting - and that predictability is weirdly comforting.
Comparison with Industry Standards:
| Aspect | Industry Average | Nikola Ilic's Approach | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teaching style | Random tips, trend chasing | A few signature frameworks repeated | Stronger personal brand memory |
| Reader role | Passive consumer | Active participant (questions + prompts) | More comments and shares |
| Depth per post | Surface-level | One idea, explained clearly | More saves, more trust |
Now, compare that with Kieran and Richard.
| Creator | Primary content engine | Typical reader payoff | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola | Framework coaching | "I can apply this at work tomorrow" | Can feel repetitive if you want novelty |
| Kieran | Timely takes + operator lessons | "I learned something new fast" | Hot-take fatigue if overdone |
| Richard | Expert analysis and industry synthesis | "I understand the market better" | Can feel niche to non-legal readers |
Same Hero Score, different reasons people come back.
3. His formatting is optimized for scanning (without feeling gimmicky)
This part surprised me because it's easy to miss: Nikola's layout is doing a ton of work.
Short paragraphs. Standalone lines for emphasis. Clear section headers (often with emojis). Tight bullets with labels like "Level 1" and "Level 2." It reads like a coach walking you through a thinking exercise.
And because the writing is semi-formal (not slangy), it fits leadership audiences. It's warm, but still "boardroom safe." Pretty rare.
4. He posts with discipline, and timing probably helps
Nikola averages 5.0 posts per week, which is enough to build momentum without feeling like spam.
And the suggested best posting window is 13:00-15:00 UTC. If he's close to that window (or even consistent in any window), it adds predictability. The algorithm likes patterns. Humans do too.
One underrated advantage of Nikola's style: his posts are not dependent on breaking news. So consistency is easier.
Their Content Formula
If you want to borrow Nikola's approach, don't start by copying topics. Topic data isn't even available here.
Start by copying structure.
Content Structure Breakdown
| Component | Nikola Ilic's Approach | Effectiveness | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | Future pacing, reflective setup, or a bold contrast | High | Pulls the reader into a personal scenario |
| Body | Framework + explanation + example | Very high | Turns abstract leadership into something concrete |
| CTA | Invitation to reflect, read more, or apply | Medium-high | Feels aligned with helping, not selling |
The Hook Pattern
Nikola often opens by placing you in a moment in time. It's simple, but it hits.
Template:
"It's [a future date]. You're looking back, and you're proud."
Two more hook styles he leans on:
"Most people focus on the outcome. But that's not what changes you."
"Let me ask you a question: who do you need to become to earn that role?"
Why it works: the hook is not trying to impress strangers. It's trying to activate the reader's internal dialogue. And once that starts, people keep reading.
The Body Structure
He moves fast from emotion to clarity. No long intro. No over-explaining.
Body Structure Analysis:
| Stage | What They Do | Example Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | Create a vivid context | "It's January. You're planning the year." |
| Development | Introduce the framework | "Think of it as three levels." |
| Transition | Signpost the shift | "But here's the critical part." |
| Closing | Land the identity message | "This is about who you're becoming." |
And here's the key: even when he uses a "teaching" tone, it still feels like a conversation. Lots of rhetorical questions. Lots of "you."
The CTA Approach
Nikola's CTAs are usually not "comment below" bait. They're more like a gentle push:
- Reflect: "Isn't that where you want to be?"
- Continue: "Read more here" with a link
- Act: apply to a program, join something, sign up
Psychologically, this matters. People don't like feeling manipulated. Nikola's CTAs feel like the next step in the same coaching session.
Side-by-Side: What Nikola Does Differently (and what he shares)
I wanted to see if Nikola's playbook is unique, or just "good creator hygiene." Here's my honest take: it's both.
All three creators share a few fundamentals:
- They have a clear niche.
- They teach something.
- They show up consistently.
But Nikola's edge is his emotional positioning: leadership as identity.
| Dimension | Nikola Ilic | Kieran Flanagan | Richard Tromans |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core promise | Become a better leader | Become a sharper operator/marketer | Understand legal tech and AI shifts |
| Tone | Motivational, reflective, coach-like | Direct, punchy, opinionated | Analytical, precise, expert |
| Primary content asset | Frameworks and prompts | Timely insights + experience | Market synthesis and credibility |
| Best fit audience | Managers, leaders, educators | Founders, marketers, growth teams | Legal professionals, tech strategists |
And here's the fun part: because they all have a Hero Score of 41.00, it suggests each one has found strong resonance within their lane.
So you don't need 100k followers to "win." You need a tight promise, delivered consistently.
3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today
-
Write identity-first hooks - Start with who the reader is becoming, because that creates emotional buy-in fast.
-
Repeat one framework for 30 days - Build recognition and trust by teaching the same idea from multiple angles.
-
Format for scanning, not for vanity - Short paragraphs, clear labels, and one idea per section keeps people reading.
Key Takeaways
- Nikola's advantage is trust density - 5,159 followers paired with a 41.00 Hero Score usually means high relevance, not broad reach.
- Frameworks beat randomness - a few repeatable models can outperform a dozen disconnected tips.
- Kieran and Richard prove scale isn't the point - you can earn the same engagement score with totally different content engines.
- Consistency plus clarity is the real cheat code - especially if you post around reliable windows like 13:00-15:00 UTC.
If you try one thing this week, try this: write a post that ends with "Who do you need to become to make that true?" and see what kind of conversation it starts.
Meet the Creators
Nikola Ilic
Founder of the Democratic Leadership Framework | Leadership professor at Georgetown Uni | Trainings & Leadership Programs | Action Learning Expert | AI in service of human experience
๐ United States ยท ๐ข Industry not specified
Kieran Flanagan
Marketing (CMO, SVP) | All things AI | Sequoia Scout | Advisor
๐ Ireland ยท ๐ข Industry not specified
Richard Tromans
Founder, Artificial Lawyer
๐ United Kingdom ยท ๐ข Industry not specified
This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.