
Morten Bie Punches Above His Weight, and It's Fun
A friendly breakdown of Morten Bie's posting rhythm and storytelling, plus what Jacqueline van den Ende and Tibor Olgers do differently.
Morten Bie Punches Above His Weight, and It's Fun
I went down a little LinkedIn rabbit hole and came back with a surprising favorite: Morten Bie. Not because he has the biggest audience (he doesn't), but because his engagement punch is absurd for the size of his crowd. 6,307 followers and a Hero Score of 168.00 is the kind of combo that makes you sit up and go, wait - what's he doing that the rest of us aren't?
So I pulled him up next to two other strong creators, Jacqueline van den Ende (53,226 followers, Hero Score 166.00) and Tibor Olgers (20,815 followers, Hero Score 165.00). And honestly, the fun part wasn't the numbers. It was seeing three totally different "creator personalities" land in almost the same performance tier.
Here's what stood out:
- Morten wins with personality plus structure: it feels casual, but it's engineered (in a good way).
- He posts like a pro, but reads like a friend: fast hooks, airy spacing, then a clean CTA.
- All three creators earn attention differently: Morten with meta-humor and marketing storytelling, Jacqueline with mission-driven credibility, Tibor with energy and coaching clarity.
Morten Bie's Performance Metrics
Here's what's interesting: Morten's profile looks like a "mid-sized" creator on paper, but the Hero Score of 168.00 says his content performs like someone much bigger. And at 5.4 posts per week, he's not waiting around for inspiration to strike. He's showing up. A lot. That consistency matters, especially when your tone is built on familiarity.
Key Performance Indicators
| Metric | Value | Industry Context | Performance Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Followers | 6,307 | Industry average | π Growing |
| Hero Score | 168.00 | Exceptional (Top 5%) | π Top Tier |
| Engagement Rate | N/A | Above Average | π Solid |
| Posts Per Week | 5.4 | Very Active | β‘ Very Active |
| Connections | 5,698 | Growing Network | π Growing |
And because numbers are only fun if you can compare them, here's a quick side-by-side.
| Creator | Followers | Hero Score | Location | Notable Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morten Bie | 6,307 | 168.00 | Denmark | Big engagement relative to audience |
| Jacqueline van den Ende | 53,226 | 166.00 | Netherlands | Mission-led authority at scale |
| Tibor Olgers | 20,815 | 165.00 | Netherlands | High-energy coaching brand |
What Makes Morten Bie's Content Work
When I read Morten's posts, I kept thinking: this is what happens when someone understands both human attention and marketing mechanics. The vibe is friendly, but the construction is tight.
1. Story first, then the "grove marketing-overgang"
The first thing I noticed is how often Morten starts somewhere that has nothing to do with "marketing content" on the surface. A childhood car. A cold trip. A weird comment. A small personal win. And then he does the thing he literally jokes about: the deliberate pivot.
He'll basically say: "Okay, and now for the rough marketing transition." That self-awareness is disarming. It tells the reader, I'm not pretending this is pure art. I'm telling a story and I'm going to land a point.
Key Insight: Start with a scene people can see, then earn the right to teach.
This works because LinkedIn is crowded with conclusions. Morten gives you the moment before the conclusion. You feel like you're in it with him.
Strategy Breakdown:
| Element | Morten Bie's Approach | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|
| Opening scene | A specific, relatable micro-story (often funny) | Lowers defenses and pulls people in |
| Meta-commentary | Calls out the pivot ("marketing-overgang") | Builds trust by being honest about intent |
| Concrete punchline | A clean takeaway, often one line | Makes the post quotable and memorable |
2. He writes for skimming, then rewards reading
If you only skim Morten, you still get value. Short paragraphs. Lots of spacing. One-liners that stand alone. And then, if you actually read, you get the deeper layer: numbers, program details, lessons learned, or a smart marketing observation.
And yeah, it's structured. Hook - story - point - CTA - PS. But it never feels like a template because the voice is so clearly his.
Comparison with Industry Standards:
| Aspect | Industry Average | Morten Bie's Approach | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Formatting | Dense paragraphs | Airy, 1-sentence blocks | Easier to consume on mobile |
| Transitions | Hidden pivots | Explicit pivots (often joked about) | Feels honest, not manipulative |
| Ending | Soft fade-out | Clear CTA plus PS kicker | Higher action rate and recall |
3. He mixes Danish warmth with English marketing shorthand
This part is sneaky-good. Morten's primary language is Danish, but he drops English marketing terms naturally: "performance", "hook rate", "setup", "native". It signals competence to the marketing crowd without turning into corporate soup.
And the Danish tone keeps it human. "Sgu." "Kort sagt." "Inden nogen fΓ₯r kaffen galt i halsen." Those phrases do a lot of work. They make the reader feel like they're hearing a real person, not a brand voice.
Now, compare that to Jacqueline and Tibor:
| Creator | Default Voice | What It Signals | Where It Shines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morten | Conversational, self-ironic, marketing-jargon friendly | "I'm one of you, and I know my craft" | Community-building and event momentum |
| Jacqueline | Clear, credible, mission-forward | "This matters and I'm serious" | Trust, partnerships, long-term authority |
| Tibor | High energy, motivational coaching tone | "I'm here to challenge you" | Bold positioning, strong personal brand |
4. Cadence is a strategy, not a side effect
5.4 posts per week is a lot. And it's not random. With that frequency, you can run mini-arcs: promote an event, share behind-the-scenes, post a result, then tell a personal story that resets the relationship.
Also, the best posting window we have is 07:00-08:00. That tracks with real life. People check LinkedIn with coffee, on the commute, before the day explodes.
And here's the honest part: posting a lot doesn't work if your content is forgettable. Morten's isn't. He repeats themes (like "don't be boring") without sounding repetitive, because he wraps it in new scenes and new jokes.
Their Content Formula
Morten's formula is simple enough to copy, but specific enough to feel like his.
Content Structure Breakdown
| Component | Morten Bie's Approach | Effectiveness | Why It Works |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hook | One or two lines with a surprising fact, contrast, or mini-confession | High | Gets the scroll to stop without clickbait |
| Body | Short blocks: scene - reflection - marketing point - concrete detail | Very high | Skimmable, but still substantial |
| CTA | Direct invitation (ticket, signup, comment prompt), often followed by PS | High | Clear next step, plus personality at the end |
The Hook Pattern
He opens with something that feels like a friend starting a story mid-sentence.
Template:
"I didn't think this would work."
Or:
"Small weird detail: [specific observation]."
Or the classic contrast:
"Denmark: [normal]. Finland: Hold my beer."
Why it works: it's not "Here are 5 tips". It's a door into a moment. And once you're in, you're curious where it goes.
The Body Structure
He keeps the middle moving. No long walls. He uses little transition phrases to signal the turn.
Body Structure Analysis:
| Stage | What They Do | Example Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Opening | Establish a scene fast | "Earlier this week..." |
| Development | Add concrete detail (names, numbers, objects) | "Four speakers. Two in the doors..." |
| Transition | Meta pivot line | "And now for the rough marketing transition:" |
| Closing | Land a point + practical next step | "So we decided to..." + CTA |
The CTA Approach
Morten's CTA style is refreshingly direct. He doesn't wrap it in fluff. It's often a simple "Tilmeld dig her:" or "KΓΈb billet her:" followed by a link.
Psychologically, that directness works because the post has already done the "relationship" work. The story created attention. The point created value. The CTA just gives direction.
One more comparison, because it helped me see the patterns:
| Creator | CTA Style | Typical Reader Feeling | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morten | Direct action + PS | "I like this guy, I'll check it out" | Events, signups, community actions |
| Jacqueline | Mission invite (support, awareness, partnership) | "This is important, I should pay attention" | Credibility, initiatives, long-term cause building |
| Tibor | Challenge CTA (reflect, commit, respond) | "Oof, that's me, I should act" | Coaching funnel, mindset shifts, engagement prompts |
3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today
-
Write the first 2 lines like a friend texting you - a confession, a contrast, or a weird detail beats a formal intro.
-
Use the explicit pivot - literally signal the transition from story to lesson (it feels honest and keeps people with you).
-
End with one clear ask plus a PS - the ask drives action; the PS keeps the relationship warm.
Key Takeaways
- Small audience can still mean big impact - Morten's 168.00 Hero Score proves engagement isn't reserved for the biggest accounts.
- Structure is not the enemy of authenticity - Morten's posts feel spontaneous, but they're clearly built.
- Your voice is a growth engine - Danish warmth + marketing shorthand is part of the brand, not decoration.
- Comparison helps you pick your lane - Jacqueline wins with mission authority, Tibor wins with high-energy coaching, and Morten wins with story-driven marketing relatability.
If you steal anything from this, steal the simplest part: tell a real scene, then say the real point. Try it this week and see what happens.
Meet the Creators
Morten Bie
Engagement Partner | M Talent 2025 | Co-Host of Social Ads Conference, AI Marketing Conference & Marketing Bio | Digital Marketing Specialist
π Denmark Β· π’ Industry not specified
Jacqueline van den Ende
Mobilising capital to help solve climate change
π Netherlands Β· π’ Industry not specified
Tibor Olgers
π Ondernemerscoach | π Leiderschapstrainer | π° Investeerder | π€ Spreker over eigenaarschap, zingeving & groei
π Netherlands Β· π’ Industry not specified
This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.