Back to Blog
Laura Kremer's Community Flywheel in Action
Creator Comparison

Laura Kremer's Community Flywheel in Action

Β·LinkedIn Strategy

A friendly breakdown of Laura Kremer's LinkedIn success, with side-by-side comparisons to Wouter Blok and Jean Bonnenfant.

LinkedIn creator analysiscommunity buildingecommerce communityevent marketingpersonal brandingB2B growthcontent strategyLinkedIn creators

Laura Kremer's Community Flywheel Feels Almost Unfair

I stumbled onto Laura Kremer's profile and immediately did a double take: 12,941 followers, 8,379 connections, and a Hero Score of 149.00 while posting a very human 2.1 times per week. Not the "post 3x a day" grind. Not the mega-audience either. And yet the engagement efficiency screams "something's working here".

So I went looking for the "secret" and found something way more interesting: Laura isn't just making content. She's building a living, breathing network that creates its own momentum. And when you put her next to Wouter Blok (149.00 Hero Score, 10,592 followers) and Jean Bonnenfant (148.00 Hero Score, 48,968 followers), the differences get really telling.

Here's what stood out:

  • Laura turns community into a repeatable growth loop (not just a vibe).
  • She writes like a person you actually want to meet at the event she just invited you to.
  • Her posts feel like moments in a story, not isolated tips floating in the feed.

Laura Kremer's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: Laura's Hero Score (149.00) is top tier while her audience is mid-sized. That usually means the content is doing two things at once: (1) resonating hard with the right people, and (2) pulling those people into action (comments, signups, shares, DMs). It doesn't look like "reach-first" content. It looks like "relationship-first" content that still travels.

Key Performance Indicators

MetricValueIndustry ContextPerformance Level
Followers12,941Industry average⭐ High
Hero Score149.00Exceptional (Top 5%)πŸ† Top Tier
Engagement RateN/AAbove AverageπŸ“Š Solid
Posts Per Week2.1ModerateπŸ“ Regular
Connections8,379Growing NetworkπŸ”— Growing

What Makes Laura Kremer's Content Work

Before we get tactical, a quick side-by-side snapshot helped me see the shape of each creator's "game".

Quick vibe check: Laura feels like the community host. Wouter feels like the connector-consultant. Jean feels like the growth operator who ships systems.
MetricLaura KremerWouter BlokJean Bonnenfant
Followers12,94110,59248,968
Hero Score149.00149.00148.00
LocationGermanyNetherlandsNetherlands
Posting cadence2.1/weekN/AN/A
PositioningeCom community builderGrowth consultant + connectorHead of Growth + AI automation

Now, the strategies.

1. Community-first storytelling (not "content-first")

So here's what she does: she writes posts that feel like you're already part of something. Even if you've never met her. The repeated "Crew" address, the mini-scenes (late-night arrivals, behind-the-scenes chaos), and the shared emotional moments (gratitude, hype, nerves) all signal: "This is a group. Come in."

And it doesn't read like manufactured belonging. It's specific. It's event-shaped. It's names, cities, formats, collabs, "we did this" energy.

Key Insight: Build posts like invitations to a real room, not broadcasts to a crowd.

This works because LinkedIn is quietly starving for community that isn't cringe. People want to feel chosen and useful. Laura's writing makes the reader a participant, not an audience member.

Strategy Breakdown:

ElementLaura Kremer's ApproachWhy It Works
Community address"Crew", direct "du/ihr"Pulls readers into the story immediately
Mini-scenesConcrete moments (time, place, emotion)Creates memory and trust fast
Shared missionVisibility, support, building togetherGives the audience a reason to care

2. Event gravity: she creates offline moments that power online reach

Now here's where it gets interesting: Laura's content has "gravity" because it's anchored to real-world happenings. Announcements, recaps, speaker lineups, limited spots, city-specific energy. That naturally creates urgency without sounding salesy.

A lot of creators try to manufacture urgency with hot takes. Laura gets urgency from logistics: dates, seats, meetups, "it's a wrap", "next stop".

Comparison with Industry Standards:

AspectIndustry AverageLaura Kremer's ApproachImpact
UrgencyGeneric "DM me"Real constraints (cities, time, seats)More action, fewer lurkers
Social proofVague "great people"Names, brands, collabs, photos impliedTrust accelerates
ValueTips-onlyExperiences + relationships + learningsStickier audience

And compared to the other two creators, this is a clear differentiator.

AngleLaura KremerWouter BlokJean Bonnenfant
Primary "asset"Community + eventsNetwork + advisory credibilityGrowth systems + AI automation
Content anchorMoments, meetups, storiesConnections, insights, frameworksExecution, process, results
What followers buy intoBelonging + energyAccess + perspectiveSkill + speed

3. The "Mischstil" voice: professional brain, social-native mouth

I noticed Laura's writing sits in a sweet spot: modern business German plus a slightly cheeky social tone, with English punch-ins like "Beast Mode On" or "Call me Nuts". It's playful, but the intent is serious.

And the structure is tuned for mobile: short paragraphs, single-line punches, a quick "Fazit?" moment, then a clear question or signup.

What surprised me is how much this matters. Plenty of people have good ideas. But Laura packages them like a friend texting you exciting news, not like a deck.

4. CTAs that feel like a natural next step (not a funnel)

Laura's CTAs aren't "Smash like" vibes. They're either:

  • practical (signup links on their own line)
  • participatory ("Wer von euch kommt?", "Na, was sagt ihr?")
  • identity-based ("Macht euch bereit")

And that maps nicely to how real communities grow: action + conversation + shared language.

One more detail I wouldn't ignore: best posting windows listed as early morning (07:30-09:00) and late morning (11:00-12:00). That lines up with the "commute + coffee scroll" and "before lunch check-in" behavior. It's not magic, but it helps the first 30-60 minutes of traction.


Their Content Formula

Laura's "formula" isn't a rigid template, but you can absolutely see repeating patterns.

Content Structure Breakdown

ComponentLaura Kremer's ApproachEffectivenessWhy It Works
HookShort, energetic, often "Crew" + moment/cityHighInstant context + belonging
BodyMini-story + specifics + meaningHighConcrete details make it real
CTAQuestion or signup link, visually separatedHighLow friction next step

The Hook Pattern

She often opens with a 1-2 punch: a community callout plus a scene-setting line.

Template:

"Crew, [it's a wrap / macht euch bereit / kleines Update].
[City/format] + one vivid detail."

A few examples in her style (not direct quotes):

  • "Crew, it's a wrap. Berlin war wild."
  • "Hej Crew, Kopenhagen is calling."
  • "Beast Mode On. Und ja, das wird ein Happening."

Why it works: you're not trying to be clever for strangers. You're speaking to "your people". And weirdly, that attracts new people too, because it signals confidence and clarity.

The Body Structure

Laura builds momentum fast. No long runway. Context appears early, then details, then emotion, then the next step.

Body Structure Analysis:

StageWhat They DoExample Pattern
OpeningDrop into the moment"Es ist spΓ€t, ich bin hellwach..."
DevelopmentAdd context + why it matters"Seit einem Jahr stand das auf der Liste..."
TransitionUse short pivots + rhetorical questions"Und trotzdem... Na, was sagt ihr?"
ClosingMeaning + invitation"Fazit? ... Wer ist dabei?"

The CTA Approach

Psychologically, her CTAs work because they match the vibe of the post. If it's an event announcement, the CTA is clean and logistical. If it's a recap, the CTA becomes a question that keeps the community moving.

A reusable closing pattern:

"Fazit? [one sentence meaning].

Wer von euch [kommt / hat Fragen / will das in Stadt X]?

Signup: [link]"


Laura vs. Wouter vs. Jean: what the numbers suggest

This is the part I kept coming back to. All three have nearly identical Hero Scores (148-149). But they achieve it from different starting points.

CreatorAudience sizeHero ScoreWhat that suggests
LauraMid149.00High resonance in a tight niche community
WouterMid149.00Strong engagement via relationship capital and networking
JeanLarge148.00Scales engagement across a broader growth audience

And here's my personal take: Laura's advantage is that her "product" is the community itself. That gives her content a built-in reason to exist every week.

Wouter's strength likely sits in being a connector with a clear consulting identity. You can imagine posts that turn conversations into insights, and insights into introductions.

Jean's angle is different: growth + AI automation tends to attract people looking for repeatable tactics and systems. With 48,968 followers, maintaining a 148.00 Hero Score is no joke. That's consistency.


3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

  1. Write to your "room", not the whole feed - pick a name for your people (clients, builders, crew) and speak like they're already here.

  2. Anchor posts to real events or real constraints - dates, seats, decisions, deadlines. Reality creates urgency without fake hype.

  3. Separate your CTA like it's a button - one blank line before it, one clear ask, and if there's a link, put it alone.


Key Takeaways

  1. Hero Score loves clarity - Laura's niche is obvious and repeated: eCom + community + events.
  2. Belonging is a growth channel - her "Crew" language isn't fluff, it's retention.
  3. Offline momentum fuels online trust - announcing and recapping real meetups creates proof fast.
  4. Simple structure beats fancy writing - short hooks, mini-scenes, clear CTAs.

Give it a try for two weeks: pick a "room", tell one real scene, and end with one clean question. Then watch what kind of people start showing up.


Meet the Creators


This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.