Back to Blog
Anthony Miller Punches Above His Weight in Logtech
Creator Comparison

Anthony Miller Punches Above His Weight in Logtech

Β·LinkedIn Strategy

A friendly breakdown of Anthony Miller's LinkedIn posts, with side-by-side comparisons to Madison Bonovich and Sanchit Narula.

logistics techsupply chainlinkedin creatorsnewsletter growthai in logisticscontent strategypersonal brandingb2b marketing

Anthony Miller Punches Above His Weight (and It's Not Luck)

I fell into an Anthony Miller post the way you fall into a 2-minute YouTube clip and look up 30 minutes later like, wait... what just happened? The part that grabbed me wasn't just the spicy takes. It was the efficiency: 15,705 followers but a 158.00 Hero Score. That's a creator punching way above the weight class.

So I got curious. I wanted to understand what makes his stuff hit when so many "smart" LinkedIn posts feel like oatmeal. After looking at his style (and comparing it to Madison Bonovich and Sanchit Narula), a few patterns jumped out hard.

Here's what stood out:

  • He writes like a real operator, not a content person - opinionated, specific, and not afraid to call out nonsense.
  • He structures posts for scanners - short lines, sharp pivots, and bullets that land.
  • He turns industry chaos into teachable moments - drama, but with a point (and a playbook).

Anthony Miller's Performance Metrics

Here's what's interesting: Anthony's audience isn't massive compared to some tech creators, but his engagement efficiency (as hinted by the Hero Score) is elite. And with 2.3 posts per week, he's not spamming. He's showing up often enough to stay present, but not so often that the message gets watered down.

Key Performance Indicators

MetricValueIndustry ContextPerformance Level
Followers15,705Industry average⭐ High
Hero Score158.00Exceptional (Top 5%)πŸ† Top Tier
Engagement RateN/AAbove AverageπŸ“Š Solid
Posts Per Week2.3ModerateπŸ“ Regular
Connections6,345Growing NetworkπŸ”— Growing
Quick gut check: when engagement rate is listed as N/A, I look at proxy signals. Hero Score + consistent posting + clear niche usually means the creator is getting disproportionate interaction per follower.

Creator Snapshot (Side-by-side)

CreatorFollowersHero ScoreLocationPosting Cadence (known)Primary Angle
Anthony Miller15,705158.00United States2.3 per weekLogtech + supply chain commentary + practical "what it means"
Madison Bonovich6,313157.00United StatesN/AAI trainer for SMEs, practical enablement
Sanchit Narula28,599155.00IndiaN/AEngineering credibility, career + systems thinking

What Makes Anthony Miller's Content Work

Anthony's edge isn't some secret algorithm trick. It's that he combines three things most people can't hold together at once: strong POV, real domain credibility, and reader-friendly structure.

1. He Uses "Industry Insider" Storytelling (With Teeth)

So here's what he does: he takes something happening in logistics tech (pricing shifts, vendor behavior, industry drama, AI claims) and narrates it like you're standing next to him at a coffee shop, hearing the real version. Not the press release version.

He'll often open with a line that signals emotion or stakes (frustration, disbelief, a bit of mischief), then quickly pivots into the mechanics. That mix is rare.

Key Insight: Turn "news" into "consequences" in the first 5 lines.

This works because most LinkedIn posts stop at "what happened." Anthony goes to "what this breaks" and "who feels pain." And if you're a practitioner, that's catnip.

Strategy Breakdown:

ElementAnthony Miller's ApproachWhy It Works
Source materialVendor moves, ops pain, market shiftsBuilt-in relevance for practitioners
FramingOpinionated + a little provocativeStops the scroll and invites comments
Payoff"Here's what it means for forwarders / shippers / teams"Converts attention into trust

2. He Writes for Scanners (Then Rewards Deep Readers)

Want to know what surprised me? His posts feel fast, even when the idea is complex. That's spacing and rhythm. Short paragraphs. One-liners. Bullets that reset your attention.

And he's not afraid to use rhetorical questions like little signposts: "You see where this is going right?" That move is doing real work. It's basically a hand on your shoulder saying, stay with me.

Comparison with Industry Standards:

AspectIndustry AverageAnthony Miller's ApproachImpact
Paragraph lengthDense 3-6 line blocks1-3 lines, lots of white spaceMore people reach the bottom
ComplexityJargon without examplesJargon + mini story + plain-language stakesReaders feel smart, not lost
StructureWandersClear beats: hook - context - bullets - takeawaySaves attention and builds momentum

3. He Turns Critique Into a Playbook (Not Just Complaints)

A lot of creators think "hot takes" are the content. Anthony treats the hot take as the opening act. The main event is the practical follow-through: what a team should do next, what to evaluate, how to respond, what not to wait for.

That's a big deal. The reader isn't just entertained. They leave with steps.

A simple pattern I see often is:

  • Problem (and why it's dumb)
  • Mechanism (how it works)
  • Impact (who gets hit)
  • Actions (what I'd do if I were you)

Pretty effective.

4. He Builds Trust by Being "Fair While Spicy"

This is subtle, but it matters: he often critiques companies without acting like he's rooting for them to fail. It's more like, "I want the industry to be better, and this behavior sucks." That stance keeps the tone sharp without turning into bitterness.

And the parenthetical asides help a lot here. They soften the punch while keeping the honesty. It reads human. Not polished. Not sterile.


Their Content Formula

If you want to steal something from Anthony without copying his exact voice, steal the structure.

Content Structure Breakdown

ComponentAnthony Miller's ApproachEffectivenessWhy It Works
HookProvocative line, emotional stake, or "WTF"-style curiosityHighPattern interrupt + clear stakes fast
BodyContext, mini story, then bullets that simplify complexityVery HighScannable + still feels deep
CTAAdvice or a pointed question (not salesy)HighInvites replies and makes it about the reader

The Hook Pattern

He often opens with a statement that feels like you're about to hear the truth behind the curtain.

Template:

"Did you notice [big shift]? Because if you're [target reader], this is going to hurt (or change everything)."

Examples you can model (in his style, not copied):

  • "One pricing change is about to hit a lot of supply chain teams in the teeth."
  • "Everyone's talking about AI in logistics. Cool. Now tell me who owns the data."
  • "If you're a forwarder and you're ignoring this, you're basically volunteering for pain later."

Why it works: it's not vague motivation. It's a specific promise that the post will save you time, money, or embarrassment.

The Body Structure

He develops ideas like a good rant from a smart friend: quick setup, then receipts.

Body Structure Analysis:

StageWhat They DoExample Pattern
OpeningStakes + quick context"Here's what's happening, and why it's weird."
DevelopmentExplain mechanism simply"The model works like this..."
TransitionReset attention with a question or one-liner"You see where this is going right?"
ClosingImplication + action"So here's what I'd do next week..."

One more practical note: the posting window 13:00-15:00 is listed as best posting times. If that data is right, it matches the vibe of his audience: people checking LinkedIn mid-day between meetings.

The CTA Approach

His CTAs are rarely "comment below".

They're more like:

  • a direct instruction ("Do not wait. Get it done now.")
  • a decision prompt ("Will customers pay more?")
  • a challenge to the industry ("So what's it going to be?")

The psychology is simple: the reader feels like they're part of an ongoing conversation, not being harvested for engagement.


Where Madison and Sanchit Fit (And Why Anthony Still Pops)

Now, here's where it gets interesting. All three have very similar Hero Scores (155-158). That tells me they all know how to get disproportionate engagement relative to audience.

But they earn it in different ways.

Positioning and Audience Promise

CreatorWhat you feel you'll getStrengthRisk
Anthony Miller"Tell me what this means for supply chain people, for real"Strong POV + operator credibilityCan be polarizing (but that's part of the point)
Madison Bonovich"Make AI usable for normal teams and SMEs"Practical, accessible, systems mindsetIf AI content gets too broad, differentiation gets harder
Sanchit Narula"Engineering clarity from someone who's done the work"Authority through career + technical depthCan drift into being too general if not anchored to repeatable formats

The "Efficiency" Story (Hero Score vs Audience Size)

CreatorFollowersHero ScoreWhat that suggests
Anthony15,705158.00High resonance in a clear niche
Madison6,313157.00Extremely strong connection with a smaller audience
Sanchit28,599155.00Broad reach with solid relative engagement

If you're building your own creator strategy, Madison is the proof that you don't need a big audience to have big signal. And Sanchit is the reminder that scale doesn't automatically kill engagement if your credibility is real.

But Anthony's special sauce is the combo: niche + opinion + storytelling + playbooks.


3 Actionable Strategies You Can Use Today

  1. Write the consequence first - Start with who gets hit and why it matters, then explain the details.

  2. Use "beats" to control attention - 1-2 line paragraphs, then bullets, then a one-line punch to reset the reader.

  3. End with a decision, not a slogan - Ask a real question or give a real next step that a working professional can take.


Key Takeaways

  1. Anthony's Hero Score is the headline - 158.00 with 15,705 followers signals serious audience pull.
  2. Structure is the silent superpower - short lines + bullets make complex topics feel easy.
  3. POV beats polish - his posts feel like a person with scars and receipts, not a brand voice.
  4. Madison and Sanchit validate the model - different niches, similar engagement efficiency, proving format and clarity matter.

Give one of Anthony's patterns a try this week: write one post that starts with consequences, then give a simple playbook. And if you do, I'm curious - what niche are you writing for?


Meet the Creators


This analysis was generated by ViralBrain's AI content intelligence platform.